Suppr超能文献

下肢力量和功率不对称性评估在健康和行动受限人群中的应用:可靠性及其与身体功能的关联。

Lower extremity strength and power asymmetry assessment in healthy and mobility-limited populations: reliability and association with physical functioning.

机构信息

Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Aug;22(4):324-9. doi: 10.3275/6676. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study assessed the reliability of evaluating asymmetrical strength and power deficits in the lower limbs of healthy middle-aged, healthy older and mobility-limited elders. We also explored the relationship between limb asymmetry and physical functioning.

METHODS

We evaluated baseline knee extension strength and power asymmetry data from a cohort of older adults (n=57; 74.2±0.9 yrs, 26 male) who participated in a lower body strength training study (TS) and from a cross-sectional study of community dwelling volunteers. Cross-sectional participants were recruited into: healthy middle-aged (MH) (n=31; 47.4±4.8 yrs, 14 male), healthy older (OH) (n=28; 74.0±3.6 yrs, 16 male) and mobility-limited older (OML) (n=34; 77.8±4.5 yrs, 16 male) groups. Knee extensor strength (1RM) and power asymmetry at 40% and 70% of 1RM were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Knee extension 1RM, and peak power at 40% and 70% asymmetry ICCs exhibited excellent to good reliability in the TS and OML groups (TS= 0.8, 0.7 and 0.7, respectively; OML= 0.7, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively) but not in the MH and OH groups. No consistent association between lower limb asymmetry and measures of physical functioning was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of lower limb strength and power asymmetry is more reliable in mobility-limited elders when compared to healthy middle-aged and older subjects. The relationship of lower limb asymmetry to physical functioning is poor, in contrast to associations between the absolute strength and power of the individual limbs and physical functioning.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究评估了健康中年、健康老年和行动受限老年人下肢不对称力量和力量缺陷的可靠性。我们还探讨了肢体不对称性与身体功能之间的关系。

方法

我们评估了参与下肢力量训练研究(TS)的老年受试者队列(n=57;74.2±0.9 岁,26 名男性)和社区居住志愿者的横断面研究中基线膝关节伸展力量和力量不对称数据。横断面参与者被招募到以下组别:健康中年(MH)(n=31;47.4±4.8 岁,14 名男性)、健康老年(OH)(n=28;74.0±3.6 岁,16 名男性)和行动受限老年(OML)(n=34;77.8±4.5 岁,16 名男性)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估膝关节伸展 1RM 和 40%和 70% 1RM 力量不对称的测试-重测可靠性。

结果

TS 和 OML 组中膝关节伸展 1RM 和 40%和 70% 峰值力量的 ICC 表现出极好到良好的可靠性(TS=0.8、0.7 和 0.7,分别;OML=0.7、0.7 和 0.9,分别),但在 MH 和 OH 组中没有。下肢不对称性与身体功能测量之间没有一致的关联。

结论

与健康中年和老年受试者相比,行动受限老年人下肢力量和力量不对称性的评估更可靠。与个体肢体的绝对力量和力量与身体功能之间的关联相比,下肢不对称性与身体功能的关系较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f283/4423605/d5211b5318c9/nihms684261f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验