Reid Kieran F, Martin Kimberly I, Doros Gheorghe, Clark David J, Hau Cynthia, Patten Carolynn, Phillips Edward M, Frontera Walter R, Fielding Roger A
Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Mar;70(3):374-80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu156. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
We compared the effects of two uniquely different lower extremity power training interventions on changes in muscle power, physical performance, neuromuscular activation, and muscle cross sectional area in mobility-limited older adults.
Fifty-two subjects (78±5 years, short physical performance battery score: 8.1±1) were randomized to either 16 weeks of progressive high velocity resistance training performed at low external resistance (40% of the 1-repetition maximum [1-RM] [LO]) or high external resistance (70% of 1RM [HI]). Both groups completed three sets of leg and knee extension exercises at maximum voluntary velocity, two times per week. Neuromuscular activation was assessed using surface electromyography and muscle cross sectional area (CSA) was measured using computed tomography.
At 16 weeks, LO and HI exhibited significant and similar within-group increases of leg extensor peak power (34% vs ~42%), strength (13% vs ~19%), and SPPB score (1.4±0.3 vs 1.8±0.3 units), respectively (all P < .03). Improvements in neuromuscular activation occurred in LO (P = .03) while small gains in mid-thigh muscle CSA were detected in LO (1.6%, P = .35) and HI (2.1%, P = .17). No significant between-group differences were evident for any measured parameters (all P > .25).
High velocity resistance training with low external resistance yields similar improvements in muscle power and physical performance compared to training with high external resistance in mobility-limited elders. These findings may have important implications for optimizing exercise interventions for older adults with mobility limitations.
我们比较了两种截然不同的下肢力量训练干预措施对行动受限的老年人肌肉力量、身体机能、神经肌肉激活和肌肉横截面积变化的影响。
52名受试者(78±5岁,简短体能测试得分:8.1±1)被随机分为两组,一组进行为期16周的低外部阻力(1次重复最大值[1-RM]的40%[低强度组(LO)])渐进式高速抗阻训练,另一组进行高外部阻力(1RM的70%[高强度组(HI)])渐进式高速抗阻训练。两组均以最大自主速度完成三组腿部和膝关节伸展练习,每周两次。使用表面肌电图评估神经肌肉激活情况,使用计算机断层扫描测量肌肉横截面积(CSA)。
在16周时,低强度组和高强度组的腿部伸肌峰值功率(分别约为34%和42%)、力量(分别约为13%和19%)和简短体能测试得分(分别为1.4±0.3和1.8±0.3分)在组内均有显著且相似的增加(均P < 0.03)。低强度组的神经肌肉激活有所改善(P = 0.03),而低强度组(1.6%,P = 0.35)和高强度组(2.1%,P = 0.17)的大腿中部肌肉CSA有小幅增加。对于任何测量参数,两组之间均无显著差异(均P > 0.25)。
与高外部阻力训练相比,低外部阻力的高速抗阻训练在行动受限的老年人中对肌肉力量和身体机能产生相似的改善效果。这些发现可能对优化行动受限老年人的运动干预具有重要意义。