Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;22(4):444-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328333fca6.
Anxious patients can cause unexpected increases in healthcare costs that are often overlooked. There are no studies examining the use of an educational pamphlet and its effects on secondary outcomes at colonoscopy. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of an educational pamphlet lowers the anxiety levels before colonoscopy, and if its use has any effect on the quality of the prep or medication or the amount of medication use during the procedure.
We prospectively enrolled 121 patients having a first-time screening colonoscopy. Patients were blinded and randomized into two groups. One group received standard prep instructions only (group P), and the other group received the American Gastroenterological Association colonoscopy educational pamphlet along with their prep instructions (group I). All information was sent by mail 3 weeks before the procedure. The endoscopists were blinded as to which of their patients were in the study and of those, which were in the standard prep group or the intervention group. Anxiety was measured immediately before endoscopy using the State portion of the 'State Trait Anxiety Index'. Procedure-related information was recorded and analyzed at the end of the study using a statistical package looking at primary and secondary endpoints.
Fifteen patients did not show their examination or were otherwise lost to follow-up. Of the 106 patients who completed the study, there were 55 patients in the P group and 51 in the I group. The average State Anxiety score of the P group was 45.18, and of the I group was 40.54 (P=0.014). The use of Midazolam was significantly less in the group. The use of Meperidine was lower in the I group but the difference was not statistically significant. Both the groups took the same amount of time to complete the prep, but the I group fasted longer. The I group also completed or drank more of the prep more often than the P group. The prep quality was found to be superior with less frequency of a poor prep in the I group. Most important, the I group was more likely to have a complete colonoscopy. The I group tended to have fewer questions on the day of the procedure, and less fear about what to expect on the basis of their lower anxiety scores.
We found that providing the American Gastroenterological Association educational pamphlet to patients before colonoscopy lowers the overall anxiety level, provides a reduction in sedative use during the procedure, and leads to better colon preparation when given in addition to standard instructions.
焦虑的患者可能会导致医疗费用的意外增加,而这些费用往往被忽视。目前尚无研究探讨使用教育手册及其对结肠镜检查的次要结果的影响。本研究旨在确定使用教育手册是否能降低结肠镜检查前的焦虑水平,以及其使用是否会影响准备情况、药物使用或手术过程中的药物使用量。
我们前瞻性纳入了 121 例首次接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者。患者被设盲并随机分为两组。一组仅接受标准准备说明(P 组),另一组接受美国胃肠病学会结肠镜检查教育手册和准备说明(I 组)。所有信息均在术前 3 周通过邮件发送。内镜医生对他们的患者进行了设盲,了解哪些是研究对象,哪些是标准准备组,哪些是干预组。使用“状态特质焦虑量表”的状态部分在检查前立即测量焦虑程度。在研究结束时,使用统计软件包分析与主要和次要终点相关的程序相关信息。
15 名患者未进行检查或随访丢失。在完成研究的 106 名患者中,P 组有 55 名,I 组有 51 名。P 组的平均状态焦虑评分为 45.18,I 组为 40.54(P=0.014)。咪达唑仑的使用率明显较低。I 组中使用哌替啶的频率较低,但差异无统计学意义。两组完成准备的时间相同,但 I 组禁食时间较长。I 组也更经常完成或饮用更多的准备液,因此准备质量更好,不良准备的频率较低。最重要的是,I 组更有可能进行完整的结肠镜检查。I 组在检查当天的问题较少,并且由于较低的焦虑评分,对预期结果的恐惧也较少。
我们发现,在结肠镜检查前向患者提供美国胃肠病学会教育手册可降低总体焦虑水平,减少手术过程中的镇静剂使用,并在提供标准说明的基础上,改善结肠准备情况。