• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《巴黎协定》的公共卫生影响:一项建模研究。

The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.

机构信息

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London, UK.

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e74-e83. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30249-7.

DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30249-7
PMID:33581069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

nationally determined contributions (NDCs) serve to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement of staying "well below 2°C", which could also yield substantial health co-benefits in the process. However, existing NDC commitments are inadequate to achieve this goal. Placing health as a key focus of the NDCs could present an opportunity to increase ambition and realise health co-benefits. We modelled scenarios to analyse the health co-benefits of NDCs for the year 2040 for nine representative countries (ie, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and the USA) that were selected for their contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and their global or regional influence.

METHODS

Modelling the energy, food and agriculture, and transport sectors, and mortality related to risk factors of air pollution, diet, and physical activity, we analysed the health co-benefits of existing NDCs and related policies (ie, the current pathways scenario) for 2040 in nine countries around the world. We compared these health co-benefits with two alternative scenarios, one consistent with the goal of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (ie, the sustainable pathways scenario), and one in line with the sustainable pathways scenario, but also placing health as a central focus of the policies (ie, the health in all climate policies scenario).

FINDINGS

Compared with the current pathways scenario, the sustainable pathways scenario resulted in an annual reduction of 1·18 million air pollution-related deaths, 5·86 million diet-related deaths, and 1·15 million deaths due to physical inactivity, across the nine countries, by 2040. Adopting the more ambitious health in all climate policies scenario would result in a further reduction of 462 000 annual deaths attributable to air pollution, 572 000 annual deaths attributable to diet, and 943 000 annual deaths attributable to physical inactivity. These benefits were attributable to the mitigation of direct greenhouse gas emissions and the commensurate actions that reduce exposure to harmful pollutants, as well as improved diets and safe physical activity.

INTERPRETATION

A greater consideration of health in the NDCs and climate change mitigation policies has the potential to yield considerable health benefits as well as achieve the "well below 2°C" commitment across a range of regional and economic contexts.

FUNDING

This work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust (award number 209734/Z/17/Z) and supported by an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant (grant number EP/R035288/1).

摘要

背景

国家自主贡献(NDCs)旨在实现《巴黎协定》将全球气温升幅控制在“远低于 2°C”的目标,这一过程中也能带来大量的健康协同效益。然而,现有的 NDC 承诺不足以实现这一目标。将健康作为 NDC 的重点关注领域,可能会增加雄心并实现健康协同效益。我们构建了情景模型,分析了 9 个有代表性国家(巴西、中国、德国、印度、印度尼西亚、尼日利亚、南非、英国和美国)2040 年 NDC 的健康协同效益,这些国家的选择依据是其对全球温室气体排放的贡献及其在全球或区域的影响力。

方法

通过对能源、食品和农业以及交通部门进行建模,并对与空气污染、饮食和身体活动相关的风险因素导致的死亡率进行建模,我们分析了全球 9 个国家现有 NDC 及相关政策(即当前路径情景)对 2040 年的健康协同效益。我们将这些健康协同效益与两种替代情景进行了比较,一种情景与《巴黎协定》和可持续发展目标的目标一致(即可持续路径情景),另一种情景与可持续路径情景一致,但也将健康作为政策的核心重点(即健康纳入所有气候政策情景)。

结果

与当前路径情景相比,可持续路径情景到 2040 年,9 个国家每年因空气污染相关疾病导致的死亡人数减少了 118 万,因饮食相关疾病导致的死亡人数减少了 586 万,因缺乏身体活动导致的死亡人数减少了 115 万。如果采用更具雄心的健康纳入所有气候政策情景,每年因空气污染导致的死亡人数将进一步减少 46.2 万,因饮食导致的死亡人数将减少 57.2 万,因缺乏身体活动导致的死亡人数将减少 94.3 万。这些效益归因于直接温室气体排放的减少以及减少有害污染物暴露的相应措施,以及改善饮食和安全身体活动。

解释

在 NDC 和气候变化缓解政策中更多地考虑健康问题,有可能在一系列区域和经济背景下带来可观的健康效益,并实现“远低于 2°C”的承诺。

资金

这项工作部分由惠康信托基金会(授予编号 209734/Z/17/Z)的一项无限制赠款资助,并得到了工程和物理科学研究理事会(授予编号 EP/R035288/1)的资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/0eb70ce2792f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/45600ef9c34c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/32fa6ccebacd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/bcfa9881a135/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/0eb70ce2792f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/45600ef9c34c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/32fa6ccebacd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/bcfa9881a135/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/983d/7887663/0eb70ce2792f/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.《巴黎协定》的公共卫生影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e74-e83. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30249-7.
2
Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.空气污染的健康协同效益和《巴黎协定》的缓解成本:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Role of climate goals and clean-air policies on reducing future air pollution deaths in China: a modelling study.气候目标和清洁空气政策在减少中国未来空气污染死亡人数中的作用:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):e92-e99. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00326-0.
5
Engagement with health in national climate change commitments under the Paris Agreement: a global mixed-methods analysis of the nationally determined contributions.《巴黎协定》下国家气候承诺中的健康问题参与情况:国家自主贡献的全球混合方法分析》
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e93-e101. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30302-8.
6
The Lancet Countdown on PM pollution-related health impacts of China's projected carbon dioxide mitigation in the electric power generation sector under the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.《柳叶刀倒计时》研究报告:基于《巴黎协定》,中国在发电部门减少二氧化碳排放的情景下,预测对 PM 污染相关健康影响的评估:建模研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):e151-e161. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30050-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Development of the Low Emissions Analysis Platform - Integrated Benefits Calculator (LEAP-IBC) tool to assess air quality and climate co-benefits: Application for Bangladesh.开发低排放分析平台 - 综合效益计算器 (LEAP-IBC) 工具以评估空气质量和气候协同效益:孟加拉国的应用。
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:106155. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106155. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
8
Integrated climate change and air pollution mitigation assessment for Togo.多哥的气候变化和空气污染综合缓解评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:157107. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157107. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
The Lancet Countdown on health benefits from the UK Climate Change Act: a modelling study for Great Britain.柳叶刀倒计时:英国气候变化法案带来的健康效益——大不列颠建模研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 May;2(5):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30067-6.
10
Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges.空气质量对人类健康和农业的协同效益,可抵消实现《巴黎协定》承诺的成本。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 22;9(1):4939. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Air pollution interventions for health.针对健康的空气污染干预措施。
Nat Med. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03929-8.
2
Exploring nudging strategies for plant-based dietary choices in hospital patients: a quasi-experimental study.探索针对住院患者植物性饮食选择的助推策略:一项准实验研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01793-w.
3
High resolution assessment of air quality and health in Europe under different climate mitigation scenarios.不同气候缓解情景下欧洲空气质量与健康的高分辨率评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions.减少全球空气污染:进一步政策干预的范围。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Oct 30;378(2183):20190331. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0331. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
China's post-COVID-19 stimulus: No Green New Deal in sight.中国新冠疫情后的刺激措施:不见绿色新政踪影。
Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2020 Sep;36:250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Recommendations for Keeping Parks and Green Space Accessible for Mental and Physical Health During COVID-19 and Other Pandemics.
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 3;16(1):5134. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60449-2.
4
Balancing short-term and long-term climate-health equity strategies: a framework for supporting faster, fairer joint action on climate change and health equity.平衡短期和长期气候与健康公平战略:支持在气候变化与健康公平方面更快、更公平地采取联合行动的框架
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 26;9(Suppl 1):e016094. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016094.
5
The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty: what it is, its importance for health, and why Australia should endorse it.《化石燃料不扩散条约》:其内容、对健康的重要性以及澳大利亚为何应予以认可。
Med J Aust. 2025 Apr 7;222(6):297-299. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52610. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
6
Integration of Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Actions and Health Co-Benefits: A Framework Using the Global Calculator.多种气候变化缓解行动与健康协同效益的整合:使用全球计算器的框架
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Dec;132(12):125001. doi: 10.1289/EHP14906. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
7
New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 07: Human Health and Safety.纽约州气候影响评估 第7章:人类健康与安全
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024 Dec;1542(1):385-445. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15244. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
8
Health benefits of decarbonization and clean air policies in Beijing and China.北京及中国脱碳与清洁空气政策对健康的益处。
Environ Res Lett. 2024 Dec 1;19(12):124051. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8c65. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
9
Health co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon pricing: a narrative synthesis.碳定价的健康协同效益与权衡:一项叙述性综述
Clim Policy. 2024 Jun 2;24(10):1346-1364. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2356822. eCollection 2024.
10
Summarizing Recommendations for the Prevention of Occupational Heat-Related Illness in Outdoor Workers: A Scoping Review.户外工作者职业性热相关疾病预防建议综述:一项范围综述
Workplace Health Saf. 2025 Feb;73(2):63-84. doi: 10.1177/21650799241281998. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
在 COVID-19 和其他大流行期间保持公园和绿色空间对身心健康的可及性的建议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 9;17:E59. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200204.
4
Health benefits of policies to reduce carbon emissions.减少碳排放政策的健康效益。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 30;368:l6758. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6758.
5
Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail.可持续饮食策略的健康和营养方面及其与环境影响的关联:具有国家层面细节的全球建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e451-e461. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30206-7.
6
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.在环境限度内保持食物系统的选择。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Development of the Impacts of Cycling Tool (ICT): A modelling study and web tool for evaluating health and environmental impacts of cycling uptake.发展自行车影响工具(ICT):一个用于评估自行车普及对健康和环境影响的建模研究和网络工具。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 31;15(7):e1002622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002622. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.空气污染的健康协同效益和《巴黎协定》的缓解成本:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Public health co-benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reduction: A systematic review.温室气体减排的公共卫生协同效益:系统评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.193. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.柳叶刀污染与健康委员会
Lancet. 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):462-512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.