Kuhn Melanie R, Schwanenflugel Paula J, Morris Robin D, Morrow Lesley Mandel, Woo Deborah Gee, Meisinger Elizabeth B, Sevcik Rose A, Bradley Barbara A, Stahl Steven A
Department of Learning and Teaching, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
J Lit Res. 2006 Jan 1;38(4):357-387. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1.
The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of two instructional approaches designed to improve the reading fluency of 2nd-grade children. The first approach was based on Stahl and Heubach's (2005) fluency-oriented reading instruction (FORI) and involved the scaffolded, repeated reading of grade-level texts over the course of each week. The second was a wide-reading approach that also involved scaffolded instruction. hut that incorporated the reading of 3 different grade-level texts each week and provicled significantly less opportunity for repetition. By the end of the school year. FORI and wide-reading approaches showed similar benefits for standardized measures of word reading efficiency and reading comprehension skills compared to control approachcs. although the benefits of the wide-reading approach emerged earlier and included oral text reading fluency skill. Thus, we conclude that fluency instruction that emphasizes extensive oral reading of grade-level text using scaffolded approaches is effective for promoting reading development in young learners.
本研究的目的是检验两种旨在提高二年级儿童阅读流畅性的教学方法的效果。第一种方法基于斯塔尔和霍伊巴赫(2005年)的以流畅性为导向的阅读教学法(FORI),包括在每周的课程中对年级水平的文本进行有支架的反复阅读。第二种是广泛阅读法,也包括有支架的教学,但每周要阅读3篇不同年级水平的文本,重复的机会明显更少。到学年结束时,与对照方法相比,FORI和广泛阅读法在单词阅读效率和阅读理解技能的标准化测量方面显示出相似的益处,尽管广泛阅读法的益处出现得更早,且包括口头文本阅读流畅性技能。因此,我们得出结论,使用有支架的方法强调对年级水平文本进行广泛口头阅读的流畅性教学,对于促进年轻学习者的阅读发展是有效的。