Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmologic Centre, Ospedali del Tigullio, Via don Bobbio 24, 16033 Lavagna, Italy.
Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):109-18. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup370.
Although an organizational model for syncope management facilities was proposed in the 2004 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), its implementation in clinical practice and its effectiveness are largely unknown.
This prospective study enrolled 941 consecutive patients referred to the Syncope Units of nine general hospitals from 15 March 2008 to 15 September 2008. A median of 15 patients per month were examined in each unit, but the five older units had a two-fold higher volume of activity than the four newer ones (instituted <1 year before): 23 vs. 12, P = 0.02. These figures give an estimated volume of 163 and 60 patients per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Referrals: 60% from out-of-hospital services, 11% immediate and 13% delayed referrals from the Emergency Department, and 16% hospitalized patients. A diagnosis was established on initial evaluation in 191 (21%) patients and early by means of 2.9 +/- 1.6 tests in 541 (61%) patients. A likely reflex cause was established in 67%, orthostatic hypotension in 4%, cardiac in 6% and non-syncopal in 5% of the cases. The cause of syncope remained unexplained in 159 (18%) patients, despite a mean of 3.5 +/- 1.8 tests per patient. These latter patients were older, more frequently had structural heart disease or electrocardiographic abnormalities, unpredictable onset of syncope due to the lack of prodromes, and higher OESIL and EGSIS risk scores than the other groups of patients. The mean costs of diagnostic evaluation was 209 euro per outpatient and 1073 euro per inpatient. The median cost of hospital stay was 2990 euro per patient.
We documented the current practice of syncope management in specialized facilities that have adopted the management model proposed by the ESC. The results are useful for those who wish to replicate this model in other hospitals. Syncope remains unexplained during in-hospital evaluation in more complex cases at higher risk.
尽管欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)2004 年指南提出了晕厥管理设施的组织模式,但在临床实践中的实施情况及其效果在很大程度上尚不清楚。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2008 年 3 月 15 日至 2008 年 9 月 15 日来自 9 家综合医院晕厥科的 941 例连续就诊患者。每个科室平均每月检查 15 例患者,但 5 个较老的科室的活动量是 4 个较新科室(建立<1 年前)的两倍:23 例与 12 例,P=0.02。这些数字分别估计每年每 10 万居民有 163 例和 60 例患者。转诊情况:60%来自院外服务,11%为急诊科立即转诊,13%为延迟转诊,16%为住院患者。在 191 例(21%)患者的初始评估中确立了诊断,在 541 例(61%)患者中通过 2.9+/-1.6 次检查早期确立了诊断。在 67%的病例中确定了可能的反射性原因,4%为体位性低血压,6%为心脏原因,5%为非晕厥性原因。尽管每位患者平均进行了 3.5+/-1.8 次检查,但仍有 159 例(18%)患者的晕厥原因仍未解释。这些患者年龄较大,更常患有结构性心脏病或心电图异常,由于缺乏前驱症状,晕厥发作不可预测,且 OESIL 和 EGSIS 风险评分高于其他患者组。诊断评估的平均费用为门诊患者 209 欧元,住院患者 1073 欧元。每位患者的住院费用中位数为 2990 欧元。
我们记录了专门设施中晕厥管理的现行做法,这些设施采用了 ESC 提出的管理模式。这些结果对于那些希望在其他医院复制该模式的人很有用。在更复杂的高风险病例中,住院期间的评估仍未能解释晕厥。