The Center for Medical Technology Assessment/IMH, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Public Health. 2010 May;38(3):325-31. doi: 10.1177/1403494809354359. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
In most Western countries the growing gap between available resources and greater potential for medical treatment has brought evidence-based guidelines into focus. However, problems exist in areas where the evidence base is weak, e.g. elderly patients with heart disease and multiple co-morbidities.
Our aim is to evaluate the views of Swedish cardiologists on decision-making for elderly people with multiple co-morbidities and acute coronary syndrome without ST-elevation (NSTE ACS), and to generate some hypotheses for testing.
A confidential questionnaire study was conducted to assess the views of cardiologists/internists (n = 370). The response rate was 69%. Responses were analyzed with frequencies and descriptive statistics. When appropriate, differences in proportions were assessed by a chi-square test. A content analysis was used to process the answers to the open-ended questions.
81% of the respondents reported extensive use of national guidelines for care of heart disease in their clinical decision-making. However, when making decisions for multiple-diseased elderly patients, the individual physician's own clinical experience and the patient's views on treatment choice were used to an evidently greater extent than national guidelines. Approximately 50% estimated that they treated multiple-diseased elderly patients with NSTE ACS every day. Preferred measures for improving decision-making were: (a) carrying out treatment studies including elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities, and (b) preparing specific national guidelines for multiple-diseased elderly patients.
In the future, national guidelines for heart disease should be adapted in order to be applicable for elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities.
在大多数西方国家,可用资源与治疗潜力之间的差距不断扩大,这使得基于证据的指南成为关注焦点。然而,在证据基础薄弱的领域,如患有心脏病和多种合并症的老年患者,仍然存在问题。
我们的目的是评估瑞典心脏病专家对患有多种合并症和无 ST 段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)的老年患者的决策制定的看法,并提出一些假设进行检验。
进行了一项机密问卷调查研究,以评估心脏病专家/内科医生(n=370)的观点。回应率为 69%。通过频率和描述性统计分析回应。在适当的情况下,通过卡方检验评估比例差异。使用内容分析处理对开放式问题的回答。
81%的受访者报告在临床决策中广泛使用国家心脏病护理指南。然而,在为患有多种疾病的老年患者做出决策时,个体医生自己的临床经验和患者对治疗选择的看法显然比国家指南更重要。大约 50%的受访者估计他们每天都会治疗患有 NSTE ACS 的多种疾病老年患者。改善决策的首选措施是:(a)开展包括患有多种合并症的老年患者在内的治疗研究,(b)为患有多种疾病的老年患者制定特定的国家指南。
未来,应调整心脏病国家指南,使其适用于患有多种合并症的老年患者。