Alpert Judith L
Department of Applied Psychology, Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, New York University, NY, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2009 Dec;69(4):291-7; discussion 311-3. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2009.20.
The author indicates that she has two voices. One voice speaks to the patient's loneliness and detachment and her expectation to not be seen, believed, or acknowledged. This voice, housing the knowledge that events that remain unprocessed continue to have an impact, wants Dr. Prince to risk intrusion and preemption. This voice believes that it is worth it. The author's other voice considers bottomless wounds and speaks to the patient's need to build up healthy aspects of personality that is necessary to do the holocaust work. This voice holds that this is not the time for Dr. Prince to witness what happened to the patient, what the perpetrators of massive crimes did to her or what the onlookers saw and chose not to do. This voice says that the patients lead should be followed. The author elaborates on her two voices and indicates what she would have done had she been working with the patient.
作者表示她有两种声音。一种声音诉说着患者的孤独与疏离，以及她不被看见、相信或认可的期望。这个声音深知未处理的事件仍会产生影响，希望普林斯医生冒险进行干预和抢先行动。这个声音认为这样做是值得的。作者的另一种声音考虑到了深不见底的创伤，并谈到患者需要塑造健康的人格特质，这对于进行大屠杀相关工作是必要的。这个声音认为现在不是普林斯医生见证患者所遭遇之事、大规模犯罪的实施者对她做了什么或者旁观者看到了什么却选择不作为的时候。这个声音说应该听从患者的引领。作者详细阐述了她的两种声音，并指出如果她当时与这位患者合作会怎么做。
