Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍管理中手动排空和口服轻泻药的需求:逐步方案的随机对照试验。

The need for manual evacuation and oral laxatives in the management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial of a stepwise protocol.

机构信息

The National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2010 Jun;48(6):504-10. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.166. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES

High-quality evidence for interventions in bowel management (BM) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is lacking and BM programs are developed empirically. This randomized, controlled trial compared usual care with a stepwise protocol based on earlier published work to examine whether systematic use of less invasive interventions could reduce the need for oral laxatives and invasive interventions such as manual evacuation, and improve BM outcomes in individuals with chronic SCI.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

METHODS

In all, 68 individuals were recruited (35 in intervention group), median age 47 years (range 24-73 years), median duration of injury 16 years (range 1-47 years). Bowel diaries were maintained for a maximum of 6 weeks while the intervention group followed a stepwise protocol designed to test interventions singly and in combination. Measures of quality of life and preferences for different bowel care interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

The stepwise protocol did not improve BM outcomes; fecal incontinence was more frequent (P=0.04); the need for oral laxatives and invasive interventions was not reduced (P=0.4). Bowel care took consistently longer in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings support the need for manual evacuation in BM and provide evidence of acceptability of the technique to SCI individuals. For some individuals oral laxatives are an essential part of management. The results are in contrast with previous studies in younger samples with shorter duration of injury.

摘要

研究设计

随机对照试验。

研究目的

脊髓损伤(SCI)后肠道管理(BM)干预措施的高质量证据不足,BM 方案是基于经验开发的。本随机对照试验将常规护理与基于早期已发表研究的逐步方案进行比较,以检验系统使用较少侵入性干预措施是否可以减少口服泻药和手动排空等侵入性干预措施的需求,并改善慢性 SCI 患者的 BM 结局。

研究地点

英国。

研究方法

共招募了 68 名参与者(干预组 35 名),平均年龄 47 岁(范围 24-73 岁),平均损伤持续时间为 16 年(范围 1-47 年)。干预组遵循逐步方案,同时单独和联合测试干预措施,参与者在 6 周内记录排便日记。记录生活质量和对不同肠道护理干预措施的偏好。

研究结果

逐步方案并未改善 BM 结局;粪便失禁更频繁(P=0.04);口服泻药和侵入性干预措施的需求并未减少(P=0.4)。干预组的肠道护理时间始终更长。

研究结论

研究结果支持在 BM 中进行手动排空,并为 SCI 患者对该技术的可接受性提供了证据。对于一些患者,口服泻药是管理的重要组成部分。结果与以前在损伤持续时间较短的年轻样本中的研究结果相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验