Exercise Science Department, East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, East Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009 Sep;4(3):317-30. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.4.3.317.
To investigate the intersession reliability of selected kinematic and kinetic variables during countermovement vertical jumps (CMJs).
Thirty-five men and 35 women performed CMJs on a force platform during four testing sessions each separated by 1 wk. Kinematic variables included time in the air (TIA), take-off velocity (TOV), total vertical displacement of the center of mass (TJH), and countermovement depth, whereas kinetic variables included positive impulse, negative impulse, vertical stiffness, and rates of force development. Systematic bias was assessed by calculating the 90% confidence interval of the change in the mean between consecutive testing sessions and between the first and final testing session for each variable. Coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were also calculated.
Systematic bias was observed only for peak rate of force development during the concentric phase of the movement. For TIA, TOV, and TJH, CV values ranged from 1.7% to 6.6%, with ICC values ranging from 0.82 to 0.97. The other variables showed greater variation (CV range: 1.7% to 39.9%; ICC range: 0.04 to 0.99). Only slight gender differences were found in the reliability statistics, and the reliability of most of the variables was diminished as the time between the testing sessions was increased.
Even though practitioners can expect good reliability for jump height measured from a force platform in men and women, other kinematic and kinetic variables often assessed during vertical jumps may not be reliable.
研究反跳垂直跳跃(CMJ)过程中选定运动学和动力学变量的组间可靠性。
35 名男性和 35 名女性在四次测试中,每次测试间隔 1 周,在力台上进行 CMJ。运动学变量包括空中时间(TIA)、起跳速度(TOV)、质心总垂直位移(TJH)和反跳深度,动力学变量包括正向冲量、负向冲量、垂直刚度和力发展速率。通过计算连续测试会话之间和每个变量的第一和最后测试会话之间均值变化的 90%置信区间来评估系统偏差。还计算了变异系数(CV)和组内相关系数(ICC)。
仅在运动的向心阶段观察到峰值力发展速率的系统偏差。对于 TIA、TOV 和 TJH,CV 值范围为 1.7%至 6.6%,ICC 值范围为 0.82 至 0.97。其他变量的变化更大(CV 范围:1.7%至 39.9%;ICC 范围:0.04 至 0.99)。在可靠性统计数据中仅发现了轻微的性别差异,并且随着测试会话之间的时间增加,大多数变量的可靠性降低。
尽管从业者可以期望从力台上测量的男女跳跃高度具有良好的可靠性,但在垂直跳跃中经常评估的其他运动学和动力学变量可能不可靠。