School of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1245-53. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992217. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
To examine associations between parenting styles, family structure and aspects of adolescent dietary behaviour.
Cross-sectional study.
Secondary schools in the East Midlands, UK.
Adolescents aged 12-16 years (n 328, 57 % boys) completed an FFQ assessing their consumption of fruit, vegetables, unhealthy snacks and breakfast. Adolescents provided information on parental and sibling status and completed a seventeen-item instrument measuring the general parenting style dimensions of involvement and strictness, from which four styles were derived: indulgent, neglectful, authoritarian, authoritative.
After controlling for adolescent gender and age, analysis of covariance revealed no significant interactions between parenting style and family structure variables for any of the dietary behaviours assessed. Significant main effects for family structure were observed only for breakfast consumption, with adolescents from dual-parent families (P < 0.01) and those with no brothers (P < 0.05) eating breakfast on more days per week than those from single-parent families and those with one or more brother, respectively. Significant main effects for parenting style were observed for all dietary behaviours apart from vegetable consumption. Adolescents who described their parents as authoritative ate more fruit per day, fewer unhealthy snacks per day, and ate breakfast on more days per week than those who described their parents as neglectful.
The positive associations between authoritative parenting style and adolescent dietary behaviour transcend family structure. Future research should be food-specific and assess the efficacy of strategies promoting the central attributes of an authoritative parenting style on the dietary behaviours of adolescents from a variety of family structures.
探讨父母教养方式、家庭结构与青少年饮食行为各方面之间的关系。
横断面研究。
英国东米德兰兹的中学。
12-16 岁青少年(n 328,57%为男性)完成了一份 FFQ,评估他们水果、蔬菜、不健康零食和早餐的摄入量。青少年提供了父母和兄弟姐妹的状态信息,并完成了一个包含 17 个项目的工具,评估了父母一般教养方式的参与度和严格度维度,从中得出了四种风格:放纵型、忽视型、专制型、权威型。
在控制了青少年的性别和年龄后,协方差分析显示,在评估的任何饮食行为中,教养方式和家庭结构变量之间没有显著的相互作用。仅对早餐消费观察到家庭结构的显著主效应,与来自双亲家庭的青少年(P<0.01)和没有兄弟姐妹的青少年(P<0.05)相比,来自单亲家庭的青少年和有一个或多个兄弟的青少年每周吃早餐的天数更多。除了蔬菜摄入量外,教养方式的所有饮食行为都有显著的主效应。与描述父母为忽视型的青少年相比,描述父母为权威型的青少年每天吃更多的水果、更少的不健康零食,并且每周吃早餐的天数更多。
权威型父母教养方式与青少年饮食行为之间的积极关联超越了家庭结构。未来的研究应该针对特定的食物,并评估促进权威型父母教养方式的核心属性对来自各种家庭结构的青少年饮食行为的效果。