• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下对大于4厘米肿瘤行部分肾切除术:一项对比研究。

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm: a comparative study.

作者信息

Lifshitz David A, Shikanov Sergey A, Deklaj Tom, Katz Mark H, Zorn Kevin C, Shalhav Arieh L

机构信息

Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0348.

DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0348
PMID:19958147
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of patients with clinical T(1a) and T(1b) renal tumors after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 184 patients who underwent LPN were retrieved from a prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved database. The patients were stratified for analysis into groups: 149 (81%) patients with clinical stage T(1a) (group 1) and 35 (19%) patients with clinical stage T(1b) (group 2). Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, operative time, conversion rate, intraoperative complication rate, and hospital stay were observed. The incidence of postoperative complications in group 2, however, was twice that of group 1 (25.7% vs 12%) (P = 0.04). Clinical staging correlated with the pathologic staging in 96% of the patients in group 1 and in only 71% in group 2 (P < 0.001). Upstaging to pT(2) or pT(3) occurred in 29% of the patients in group 2. High-grade tumors were more prevalent in group 2 (36% vs 12%) (P = 0.001). The number of patients with positive margin was higher in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean decline in estimated creatinine clearance (median follow-up 18 months) was significantly higher in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

LPN in patients with tumors >4 cm, while safe and feasible in experienced hands, is associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, as well as a higher rate of pathologic upstaging. Such data should be discussed when counseling patients with larger tumors for LPN.

摘要

目的

比较临床T(1a)和T(1b)期肾肿瘤患者行腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)后的围手术期及功能结局。

患者与方法

从一个前瞻性、经机构审查委员会批准的数据库中检索184例行LPN患者的数据。将患者分层分析为两组:149例(81%)临床分期为T(1a)期的患者(第1组)和35例(19%)临床分期为T(1b)期的患者(第2组)。比较围手术期和术后结局。

结果

第1组和第2组在热缺血时间、估计失血量、手术时间、中转率、术中并发症发生率和住院时间方面未观察到显著差异。然而,第2组术后并发症发生率是第1组的两倍(25.7%对12%)(P = 0.04)。第1组96%的患者临床分期与病理分期相关,而第2组仅71%相关(P < 0.001)。第2组29%的患者病理分期升为pT(2)或pT(3)。高级别肿瘤在第2组更常见(36%对12%)(P = 0.001)。第2组切缘阳性患者数量较多,但差异无统计学意义。第2组估计肌酐清除率的平均下降幅度(中位随访18个月)显著更高。

结论

对于肿瘤>4 cm的患者,LPN在经验丰富的医生手中虽然安全可行,但术后并发症发生率较高,且病理分期升级率也较高。在为较大肿瘤患者提供LPN咨询时,应讨论这些数据。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm: a comparative study.腹腔镜下对大于4厘米肿瘤行部分肾切除术:一项对比研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0348.
2
Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes.腹腔镜根治性与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗 T1bN0M0 期临床肾肿瘤:围手术期、病理和功能结局比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1603-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0312.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumors.临床T1a期肾肿瘤腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):953-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0300.
4
Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm.腹腔镜下大于 4cm 肿瘤肾部分切除术的围手术期疗效。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.039. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
5
Impact of renal lesion size on perioperative and pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.肾病变大小对接受腹腔镜肾部分切除术患者围手术期及病理结果的影响。
J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):439-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0223.
6
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).机器人辅助与腹腔镜下复杂性肾肿瘤(RENAL肾计量评分7分及以上)部分肾切除术围手术期结果的比较
Korean J Urol. 2014 Dec;55(12):808-13. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.808. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
7
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
8
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.离断与完全阻断控制腹腔镜肾部分切除术:按临床分期比较。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗复杂肿瘤:围手术期结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
10
Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术治疗直径>4 cm肿瘤的中期肿瘤学及功能结局
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.059.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis.T1b 期肿瘤行开放与腹腔镜肾部分切除术的肿瘤学及功能结局:单中心分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):341-350. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865.
2
Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.保留肾单位手术中的缺血技术:手术、肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):477-491. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
3
Open partial nephrectomy: ancient art or currently available technique?
开放性部分肾切除术:古老技艺还是现代可用技术?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Dec;47(12):1923-32. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1120-z. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
4
Risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy.肾部分切除术后出血的危险因素。
Korean J Urol. 2014 Jan;55(1):17-22. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.17. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
5
Comparison between laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术的比较:手术、肿瘤学和功能结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;29(11):624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
6
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses.针对直径大于4厘米肾肿块的腹腔镜下部分肾切除术。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 May-Jun;7(5-6):E281-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1003.
7
Novel high-intensity focused ultrasound clamp--potential adjunct for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.新型高强度聚焦超声夹具——腹腔镜部分肾切除术的潜在辅助手段。
J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1494-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0107. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
8
Partial nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma: A safe and superior treatment option.T1b期肾细胞癌的部分肾切除术:一种安全且更优的治疗选择。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Apr;6(2):128-30. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12056.
9
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: risk stratification according to patient and tumor characteristics.腹腔镜部分肾切除术:根据患者和肿瘤特征进行风险分层。
World J Urol. 2012 Oct;30(5):639-46. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0806-9. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
10
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results.腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肿瘤>4cm 与肿瘤<4cm 的比较:围手术期结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Jun;43(2):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9812-x. Epub 2010 Aug 1.