• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

球囊泵辅助冠状动脉介入治疗研究(BCIS-1):研究方案与设计。

The balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): rationale and design.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2009 Dec;158(6):910-916.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.015
PMID:19958856
Abstract

Several observational studies have suggested that mortality and major complications after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be reduced by elective insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, to date, this assertion has never been tested in a randomized trial, and as such, international guidelines do not provide formal recommendations for IABP use in this setting. The BCIS-1 is a randomized trial that addresses the hypothesis that elective IABP insertion before high-risk PCI will reduce major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at hospital discharge or 28 days after index PCI, whichever occurs sooner. High risk is defined by the presence of severe left ventricular dysfunction as well as a large amount of myocardium at risk. Patients who are in cardiogenic shock, have a class I indication for IABP use, or have an absolute contraindication to IABP use will be excluded. Three hundred eligible patients will be randomized to receive elective IABP insertion or no planned IABP insertion. The findings of BCIS-1 are expected to define the role of balloon counterpulsation in high-risk PCI. Confirmation of the efficacy of elective IABP use may prompt review of the international guidelines, which are currently very restricted. In contrast, a neutral or adverse outcome with elective counterpulsation in these high-risk patients will allow evidence-based rationalization of the current disparity between guidelines and the frequent real-world use of elective IABP support.

摘要

几项观察性研究表明,高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后通过选择性插入主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)可以降低死亡率和主要并发症。然而,迄今为止,这一说法从未在随机试验中得到验证,因此,国际指南并未对此类情况下使用 IABP 提供正式建议。BCIS-1 是一项随机试验,旨在验证假设:高危 PCI 前选择性插入 IABP 将降低主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCEs)在出院时或指数 PCI 后 28 天,以先发生者为准。高危定义为存在严重左心室功能障碍以及大量心肌处于危险之中。排除心源性休克患者、有 IABP 使用 I 类适应证的患者或有 IABP 使用绝对禁忌证的患者。将 300 名符合条件的患者随机分为接受选择性 IABP 插入或无计划 IABP 插入。BCIS-1 的研究结果有望确定球囊反搏在高危 PCI 中的作用。选择性 IABP 使用的疗效得到证实可能会促使审查目前非常有限的国际指南。相比之下,在这些高危患者中进行选择性反搏的中性或不良结果将允许基于证据的合理化目前指南之间的差异和频繁的现实世界中使用选择性 IABP 支持。

相似文献

1
The balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): rationale and design.球囊泵辅助冠状动脉介入治疗研究(BCIS-1):研究方案与设计。
Am Heart J. 2009 Dec;158(6):910-916.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.015.
2
Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中选择性主动脉内球囊反搏:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):867-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1190.
3
Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.预防性主动脉内球囊反搏在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危患者中的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):608-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.036. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
4
Intra-aortic counterpulsation does not improve coronary flow early after PCI in a high-risk group of patients: observations from a randomized trial to explore its mode of action.在高危患者群体中,主动脉内反搏在PCI术后早期并不能改善冠脉血流:一项探索其作用方式的随机试验的观察结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Aug;19(8):339-46.
5
[Therapeutical efficacy of routine intra-aortic balloon pump support in patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention].[常规主动脉内球囊反搏支持对高危急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2007 Dec;27(12):1927-8.
6
On-site immediate removal of intraortic balloon pump after high-risk percutaneous intervention with a 6 F closure suture device with the "preclosure" technique.在高危经皮介入术后,采用“预闭合”技术,使用6F闭合缝合装置在现场即时移除主动脉内球囊泵。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Oct 1;70(4):538-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21137.
7
Early application of an intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention.对于计划进行择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者,早期应用主动脉内球囊反搏。
J Int Med Res. 2013 Jun;41(3):754-61. doi: 10.1177/0300060513476994. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Long-term mortality data from the balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): a randomized, controlled trial of elective balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.球囊泵辅助冠状动脉介入治疗研究(BCIS-1)的长期死亡率数据:高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中选择性球囊反搏的随机对照试验。
Circulation. 2013 Jan 15;127(2):207-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.132209. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
Effect of intra-aortic balloon pump support on microcirculation during high-risk percutaneous intervention.主动脉内球囊反搏支持对高危经皮介入治疗期间微循环的影响。
Perfusion. 2009 Nov;24(6):417-21. doi: 10.1177/0267659109358208.
10
Beneficial effect of preventative intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting-a single center experience.高危患者首次冠状动脉旁路移植术中预防性主动脉内球囊反搏的有益效果:单中心经验。
Artif Organs. 2009 Aug;33(8):587-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00788.x. Epub 2009 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Sudden Cardiac Death Due to Ventricular Arrhythmia in Acute Coronary Occlusion: Potential Roles of the Sinoatrial Nodal Artery and Conus Artery.急性冠状动脉闭塞时室性心律失常所致的心源性猝死:窦房结动脉和圆锥动脉的潜在作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 31;12(6):210. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060210.
2
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction deemed not suitable for surgical revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in collaboration with the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery.左心室射血分数降低且被认为不适合外科血运重建的患者的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)与欧洲心脏病学会心血管外科工作组合作发布的临床共识声明。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 6;21(1):22-34. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01100.
3
Impact of Anatomical and Viability-Guided Completeness of Revascularization on Clinical Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.解剖学与存活心肌引导的血运重建完整性对缺血性心肌病临床结局的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;84(4):340-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.043. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading During High-Risk Coronary Intervention: Rationale and Design of the CHIP-BCIS3 Randomized Controlled Trial.高危冠状动脉介入治疗期间的经皮左心室减负荷:CHIP-BCIS3 随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar;17(3):e013367. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013367. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Angio-based coronary functional assessment predicts 30-day new-onset heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.基于血管造影的冠状动脉功能评估可预测急性心肌梗死后30天内新发心力衰竭。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;10(5):2914-2926. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14452. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
6
Predictors and Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery after Impella-Supported Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者在接受Impella支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室射血分数恢复的预测因素及预后影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 24;12(10):1576. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101576.
7
2D high resolution vs. 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.2D 高分辨率与 3D 全心心肌灌注心血管磁共振比较。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):811-819. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab103.
8
Circulatory support with larger volume intra-aortic balloon pump vs. standard volume or no-balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. A randomised study.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间使用大容量主动脉内球囊反搏与标准容量或无球囊反搏进行循环支持:一项随机研究。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Mar;16(1):30-40. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.93910. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry.依帕伐保护下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中复杂高危和适应证患者的血运重建程度的长期结果:来自罗马-维罗纳注册研究的报告。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;2019:5243913. doi: 10.1155/2019/5243913. eCollection 2019.
10
Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.主动脉内球囊反搏对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心源性休克患者是否足够有效?
Cardiol Res. 2015 Dec;6(6):339-345. doi: 10.14740/cr415w. Epub 2015 Dec 16.