• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多托槽矫治中菌斑控制效果和牙间隙刷的使用——一项随机临床试验。

Plaque control effectiveness and handling of interdental brushes during multibracket treatment--a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):408-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp088. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjp088
PMID:19959611
Abstract

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the plaque control effectiveness and handling of an interdental brush with a short curved handle and a triangular cross-section of the brush head (IDB) and an interdental brush with a long straight handle in combination with a monotufted brush head (MTB). In a split-mouth design, 110 multibracket patients were randomly assigned to group A using the MTB in the first and third quadrants and the IDB in the second and fourth quadrants or to group B who proceeded the other way around. A crossover was performed after 3 months. The plaque index (PI) was scored every 6 weeks for a period of 24 weeks, and handling was evaluated using visual analogue scales (VAS). Wilcoxon tests were used to determine differences in PI and VAS scores between the two brushes and for PI differences between the different observation periods. Differences concerning personal preference and perceived cleaning efficacy were analysed with chi-square tests. The significance levels used were P < 0.001 and P < 0.01. The PI decreased significantly, but no statistically significant difference was found between the two brushes. Subjects experienced less pain and reported better access behind the archwire with the IDB. The use of an interdental brush reduced the PI irrespective of the design of the brush head. In direct comparison, adolescent patients preferred the IDB. Further trials are required to investigate the effectiveness of the IDB in reducing decalcification during orthodontic treatment.

摘要

本随机临床试验的目的是比较使用短曲柄、三角形刷头的牙间刷(IDB)和长直柄、单束刷头的牙间刷(MTB)控制菌斑的效果和操作便利性。采用分口设计,110 名多托槽患者被随机分配到 A 组,使用 MTB 清洁第一和第三象限,使用 IDB 清洁第二和第四象限,或分配到 B 组,两组顺序相反。3 个月后进行交叉。在 24 周的时间里,每 6 周评估一次菌斑指数(PI),并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估操作便利性。Wilcoxon 检验用于比较两种牙刷的 PI 和 VAS 评分差异,以及不同观察期的 PI 差异。使用卡方检验分析个人偏好和清洁效果感知差异。使用的显著性水平为 P < 0.001 和 P < 0.01。PI 显著下降,但两种牙刷之间无统计学差异。受试者使用 IDB 时疼痛程度较低,且认为其更便于清洁弓丝后区。使用牙间刷均可降低 PI,与刷头设计无关。直接比较时,青少年患者更倾向于使用 IDB。需要进一步的研究来探讨 IDB 在正畸治疗中减少脱矿的有效性。

相似文献

1
Plaque control effectiveness and handling of interdental brushes during multibracket treatment--a randomized clinical trial.多托槽矫治中菌斑控制效果和牙间隙刷的使用——一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):408-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp088. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
2
Clinical trial of a novel interdental brush cleaning system.新型牙间隙刷清洁系统的临床试验
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):47-52.
3
Efficacy of straight versus angled interdental brushes on interproximal tooth cleaning: a randomized controlled trial.直型与角度型邻间牙刷对邻面牙齿清洁效果的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 May;12(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/idh.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
4
Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss.不同牙间隙口腔卫生方法的比较:牙间隙刷与牙线对比
J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):759-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.759.
5
Plaque and gingivitis reduction in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances-comparison of toothbrushes and interdental cleaning aids. A 6-month clinical single-blind trial.固定矫治器正畸治疗患者牙菌斑和牙龈炎减少情况——牙刷与牙间隙清洁辅助工具的比较。一项为期6个月的临床单盲试验。
J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Jan;66(1):20-38. doi: 10.1007/s00056-005-0344-4.
6
Six-month comparison of powered versus manual toothbrushing for safety and efficacy in the absence of professional instruction in mechanical plaque control.在缺乏机械菌斑控制专业指导的情况下,电动牙刷与手动牙刷安全性和有效性的六个月比较。
J Periodontol. 2002 Jul;73(7):770-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.770.
7
Comparison of interdental cleaning methods: a randomized controlled trial.牙间隙清洁方法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Periodontol. 2006 Aug;77(8):1421-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050360.
8
Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.两种旋转振荡式电动牙刷刷头在3个月内的刷头磨损情况、受试者感知及实验室清洁性能
Am J Dent. 2012 Apr;25(2):84-90.
9
Randomized multicenter study on the plaque removal efficacy of 2 interdental brushes around the base of orthodontic brackets.正畸托槽周围 2 种牙间刷清除菌斑效果的随机多中心研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Oct;164(4):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
A 30-day clinical comparison of a novel interdental cleaning device and dental floss in the reduction of plaque and gingivitis.一种新型牙间隙清洁装置与牙线在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的30天临床比较。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):33-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylaxis during multibracket appliance treatment - a survey among general dentists in Germany.多托槽矫治器治疗期间的预防措施——德国普通牙医的一项调查
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05843-4.
2
Evaluation of In Vivo Efficacy and In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Fluoride-Releasing Orthodontic Composite and Fluoride Varnish.含氟正畸复合材料与氟化物涂漆的体内疗效及体外剪切粘结强度评估
Cureus. 2025 Jan 22;17(1):e77823. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77823. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward oral health management among orthodontic patients: a cross-sectional study.
正畸患者对口腔健康管理的知识、态度和行为:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1500. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05292-5.
4
Creation of a Systematic Interdental Brush Set Based on the Passage Hole Diameter (PHD) - An In-Vitro Study.基于通道孔直径(PHD)的系统邻间牙刷的制作 - 一项体外研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Aug 16;22:409-416. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5683229.
5
Plaque cleaning efficacy of waist-shaped interdental brushes among individuals with open interproximal spaces: a systematic review.腰形牙间隙刷对牙间隙开放个体的牙菌斑清洁效果:一项系统评价
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Dec;25(4):214. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01036-0. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Effectiveness of Waterpik for oral hygiene maintenance in orthodontic fixed appliance patients: A randomised controlled trial.冲牙器对正畸固定矫治患者口腔卫生维护的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Orthod. 2023 Dec;50(4):367-377. doi: 10.1177/14653125231173708. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Effects of blue-light LED toothbrush on reducing dental plaque and gingival inflammation in orthodontic patients with fixed appliances: a crossover randomized controlled trial.蓝光 LED 牙刷对固定矫治器正畸患者减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎症的效果:一项交叉随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 15;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02977-1.
8
The efficacy of mouthwashes on oral microorganisms and gingivitis in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.正畸治疗患者使用漱口液对口腔微生物和牙龈炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02920-4.
9
Comparison of different plaque indices with regard to sensitivity and specificity for the quantification of plaque during orthodontic therapy.比较不同的菌斑指数在正畸治疗期间定量菌斑的敏感性和特异性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 5;12(1):20947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24817-y.
10
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model.空气牙线超与 I-Prox 龈沟刷在正畸模型中清洁效果的体外比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y.