• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激集大小和人工语法学习中语法的统计覆盖范围。

Stimulus set size and statistical coverage of the grammar in artificial grammar learning.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1058-64. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1058.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.16.6.1058
PMID:19966255
Abstract

Adults and children acquire knowledge of the structure of their environment on the basis of repeated exposure to samples of structured stimuli. In the study of inductive learning, a straightforward issue is how much sample information is needed to learn the structure. The present study distinguishes between two measures for the amount of information in the sample: set size and the extent to which the set of exemplars statistically covers the underlying structure. In an artificial grammar learning experiment, learning was affected by the sample's statistical coverage of the grammar, but not by its mere size. Our result suggests an alternative explanation of the set size effects on learning found in previous studies (McAndrews & Moscovitch, 1985; Meulemans & Van der Linden, 1997), because, as we argue, set size was confounded with statistical coverage in these studies.

摘要

成人和儿童是在反复接触有结构的刺激样本的基础上获得环境结构知识的。在归纳学习的研究中,一个直接的问题是需要多少样本信息来学习结构。本研究区分了样本中信息量的两个度量:集大小和样本集在多大程度上统计上涵盖了基础结构。在一项人工语法学习实验中,学习受到样本对语法的统计覆盖的影响,但不受样本大小的影响。我们的结果为之前研究中发现的样本大小对学习的影响提供了另一种解释(McAndrews & Moscovitch, 1985; Meulemans & Van der Linden, 1997),因为正如我们所认为的,在这些研究中,样本大小与统计覆盖度是混淆的。

相似文献

1
Stimulus set size and statistical coverage of the grammar in artificial grammar learning.刺激集大小和人工语法学习中语法的统计覆盖范围。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1058-64. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1058.
2
What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.在人工语法学习中关于片段我们了解到了什么?一种转移概率方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):868-76. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511188. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
3
Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.强化人工语法学习中刺激特异性的论据:长时间接触后不存在抽象表征的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):188-97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.188.
4
Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.模态内和模态间的统计学习:比较抽象表征与特定刺激表征。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):905-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x.
5
Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.人工语法学习中的迁移:重复信息的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):707-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.707.
6
Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences.音乐和语音序列中语法结构的特定领域学习。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jan;37(1):10-20. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.1.10.
7
Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.目标相关性与人工语法学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):228-38. doi: 10.1080/17470210802479113. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
8
Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion.递归增强了具有递归的人工语法学习任务中的语义。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):776-82. doi: 10.1037/a0026986. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
9
Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.语法复杂性对人工语法学习的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1122-31. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1122.
10
Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.个体在人工语法学习中的行为。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):491-501. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0039-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying different levels of practice variability for motor learning: More is not better.应用不同水平的练习变异性进行运动学习:更多并非更好。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 25;12:e17575. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17575. eCollection 2024.
2
Feature variability determines specificity and transfer in multiorientation feature detection learning.多方位特征检测学习中特征可变性决定特异性和迁移性。
J Vis. 2024 May 1;24(5):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.5.2.
3
Implicit learning of two artificial grammars.内隐学习两种人工语法。

本文引用的文献

1
What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.在人工语法学习中关于片段我们了解到了什么?一种转移概率方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):868-76. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511188. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
2
Theories of artificial grammar learning.人工语法学习理论
Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;133(2):227-44. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227.
3
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition.语言处理与习得的概率模型。
Cogn Process. 2021 Feb;22(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00996-2. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Under What Conditions Can Recursion Be Learned? Effects of Starting Small in Artificial Grammar Learning of Center-Embedded Structure.在什么条件下可以学习递归?在中心嵌入结构的人工语法学习中从小处着手的效果。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2855-2889. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12685. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Implicit learning is order dependent.内隐学习是依赖顺序的。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):204-218. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0715-4. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.信息论与人工语法学习:从冗余中推断语法性
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):195-211. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0660-2. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
7
Learning simple and complex artificial grammars in the presence of a semantic reference field: effects on performance and awareness.在存在语义参照场的情况下学习简单和复杂的人工语法:对表现和意识的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 19;6:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00158. eCollection 2015.
8
Input Variability Facilitates Unguided Subcategory Learning in Adults.输入变异性有助于成人进行无指导的子类别学习。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):826-39. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0172.
9
Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability.范例变异性使具有语言学习障碍的个体能够快速学习原本无法学习的语法。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):618-29. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0125). Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
How semantic biases in simple adjacencies affect learning a complex structure with non-adjacencies in AGL: a statistical account.简单邻接中的语义偏差如何影响 AGL 中非邻接结构的复杂结构学习:统计解释。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 19;367(1598):2046-54. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0100.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
4
Forward association, backward association, and the false-memory illusion.正向联想、反向联想与错误记忆错觉。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):554-67. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.554.
5
The influence of grammatical, local, and organizational redundancy on implicit learning: an analysis using information theory.语法冗余、局部冗余和组织冗余对内隐学习的影响:一项基于信息论的分析
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):9-23. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.9.
6
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code.早期语言习得:破解语音密码。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Nov;5(11):831-43. doi: 10.1038/nrn1533.
7
The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning.人工语法学习中对照组的使用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Jan;56(1):97-115. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000297.
8
Learning artificial grammars: no evidence for the acquisition of rules.学习人工语法:没有证据表明能习得规则。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1321-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03211833.
9
Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: the priority of holistic individuation.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1993 Mar;122(1):92-114. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.122.1.92.
10
Negative evidence in language acquisition.语言习得中的否定性证据
Cognition. 1993 Jan;46(1):53-85. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90022-n.