Pothos Emmanuel M
Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;133(2):227-44. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227.
Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is one of the most commonly used paradigms for the study of implicit learning and the contrast between rules, similarity, and associative learning. Despite five decades of extensive research, however, a satisfactory theoretical consensus has not been forthcoming. Theoretical accounts of AGL are reviewed, together with relevant human experimental and neuroscience data. The author concludes that satisfactory understanding of AGL requires (a) an understanding of implicit knowledge as knowledge that is not consciously activated at the time of a cognitive operation; this could be because the corresponding representations are impoverished or they cannot be concurrently supported in working memory with other representations or operations, and (b) adopting a frequency-independent view of rule knowledge and contrasting rule knowledge with specific similarity and associative learning (co-occurrence) knowledge.
人工语法学习(AGL)是研究内隐学习以及规则、相似性和联想学习之间对比的最常用范式之一。然而,尽管经过了五十年的广泛研究,仍未达成令人满意的理论共识。本文回顾了AGL的理论解释以及相关的人类实验和神经科学数据。作者得出结论,要对AGL有令人满意的理解,需要(a)将内隐知识理解为在认知操作时未被有意识激活的知识;这可能是因为相应的表征不丰富,或者它们无法在工作记忆中与其他表征或操作同时得到支持,以及(b)采用与频率无关的规则知识观,并将规则知识与特定的相似性和联想学习(共现)知识进行对比。