• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语境相关效用凌驾于绝对记忆之上,成为选择的决定因素。

Context-dependent utility overrides absolute memory as a determinant of choice.

机构信息

Zoology Department, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):508-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907250107. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0907250107
PMID:19966285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806750/
Abstract

A core problem of decision theories is that although decisionmakers' preferences depend on learning, their choices could be driven either by learned representations of the physical properties of each alternative (for instance reward sizes) or of the benefit (utility and fitness) experienced from them. Physical properties are independent of the subject's state and context, but utility depends on both. We show that starlings' choices are better explained by memory for context-dependent utility than by representations of the alternatives' physical properties, even when the decisionmakers' state is controlled and they have accurate knowledge about the options' physical properties. Our results support the potential universality of utility-driven preference control.

摘要

决策理论的一个核心问题是,尽管决策者的偏好取决于学习,但他们的选择可能受到对每种选择的物理属性(例如奖励大小)或从它们中获得的收益(效用和适应性)的学习表示的驱动。物理属性与主体的状态和环境无关,但效用取决于两者。我们表明,即使决策者的状态受到控制,并且他们对选项的物理属性有准确的了解,麻雀的选择也可以通过对环境相关效用的记忆得到更好的解释,而不是通过对选择的物理属性的表示。我们的研究结果支持了效用驱动偏好控制的潜在普遍性。

相似文献

1
Context-dependent utility overrides absolute memory as a determinant of choice.语境相关效用凌驾于绝对记忆之上,成为选择的决定因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):508-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907250107. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Context-dependent preferences in starlings: linking ecology, foraging and choice.情境依赖的星鸦偏好:联系生态学、觅食行为和选择。
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e64934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064934. Print 2013.
3
The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.无的力量:鸽子而非人类的风险偏好主要由对零结果的规避所驱动。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(4):431-445. doi: 10.1037/xan0000217. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
Testing cognitive models of decision-making: selected studies with starlings.测试决策的认知模型:以星椋鸟为对象的精选研究
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01723-4. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Sequential and simultaneous choices: testing the diet selection and sequential choice models.顺序选择与同时选择:检验饮食选择和顺序选择模型
Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.001.
6
The impact of learning on perceptual decisions and its implication for speed-accuracy tradeoffs.学习对知觉决策的影响及其对速度-准确性权衡的意义。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 2;11(1):2757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16196-7.
7
Rational choice, context dependence, and the value of information in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).理性选择、情境依赖性与信息在欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)中的价值。
Science. 2011 Nov 18;334(6058):1000-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1209626.
8
Choosing fast and simply: Construction of preferences by starlings through parallel option valuation.通过并行选项估值选择快速简单:椋鸟的偏好构建。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Aug 24;18(8):e3000841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000841. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Cognitive mechanisms of risky choice: is there an evaluation cost?风险选择的认知机制:存在评估成本吗?
Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
10
Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.椋鸟在延迟和奖励概率方面坚持经济合理性原则。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 6;280(1756):20122386. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2386. Print 2013 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative Value Encoding in Large Language Models: A Multi-Task, Multi-Model Investigation.大语言模型中的相对价值编码:多任务、多模型研究
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 May 9;9:709-725. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00209. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries.比较 11 个国家基于经验和描述的经济偏好。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Aug;8(8):1554-1567. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01894-9. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Recent Opioid Use Impedes Range Adaptation in Reinforcement Learning in Human Addiction.近期阿片类药物的使用会阻碍人类成瘾中强化学习的适应范围。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 May 15;95(10):974-984. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
Electrophysiological population dynamics reveal context dependencies during decision making in human frontal cortex.电生理群体动力学揭示了人类前额叶皮层在决策过程中的上下文依赖性。
Nat Commun. 2023 Nov 28;14(1):7821. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42092-x.
5
The functional form of value normalization in human reinforcement learning.人类强化学习中的价值归一化的函数形式。
Elife. 2023 Jul 10;12:e83891. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83891.
6
Outcome context-dependence is not WEIRD: Comparing reinforcement- and description-based economic preferences worldwide.结果情境依赖性并非怪异现象:比较全球基于强化和描述的经济偏好。
Res Sq. 2023 Mar 2:rs.3.rs-2621222. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2621222/v1.
7
Testing cognitive models of decision-making: selected studies with starlings.测试决策的认知模型:以星椋鸟为对象的精选研究
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01723-4. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Bumblebees retrieve only the ordinal ranking of foraging options when comparing memories obtained in distinct settings.当比较在不同环境中获得的记忆时,熊蜂只检索觅食选项的顺序排名。
Elife. 2022 Sep 27;11:e78525. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78525.
9
Two sides of the same coin: Beneficial and detrimental consequences of range adaptation in human reinforcement learning.同一枚硬币的两面:人类强化学习中范围适应的有益和有害后果。
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;7(14). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0340. Print 2021 Apr.
10
The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value.两种次优选择任务变体的功能等价性:选择比例和反应时作为价值的衡量标准。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01418-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.时间匹配的动力学:唤醒使更好的看起来更差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):208-15. doi: 10.3758/BF03210960.
2
State-dependent valuation learning in fish: banded tetras prefer stimuli associated with greater past deprivation.鱼类中与状态相关的估值学习:带纹丽脂鲤偏好与过去更大程度剥夺相关的刺激。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
3
Simultaneous and sequential choice as a function of reward delay and magnitude: normative, descriptive and process-based models tested in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).作为奖励延迟和大小函数的同时选择和顺序选择:在欧洲椋鸟(家八哥)中测试的规范、描述性和基于过程的模型。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):75-93. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.75.
4
State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate.状态依赖的学习估值驱动无脊椎动物的选择。
Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1613-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1123924.
5
State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice.状态依赖决策导致动物选择中明显违反理性的情况。
PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020402. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
6
Time, rate, and conditioning.时间、速率与条件作用。
Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.289.
7
Isolation of an internal clock.分离一个内部时钟。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Jul;7(3):242-68.