Coffman C W, Stone J F, Slocum A C, Landers A J, Schwab C V, Olsen L G, Lee S
Department of Fiber Science and Apparel Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4401, USA.
J Agric Saf Health. 2009 Oct;15(4):311-26. doi: 10.13031/2013.28886.
A convenience survey of 702 certified pesticide applicators was conducted in three states to assess the use of 16 types of engineering controls and 13 types of personal protective equipment (PPE). Results showed that 8 out of 16 engineering devices were adopted by more than 50% of the respondents. The type of crop, size of agricultural operation, and the type of pesticide application equipment were found to influence the adoption of engineering controls. Applicators working on large farms, users of boom and hydraulic sprayers, and growers of field crops were more likely to use engineering devices. Respondents reported a high level of PPE use, with chemical-resistant gloves showing the highest level of compliance. An increase in pesticide applicators wearing appropriate headgear was reported. The majority of respondents did not wear less PPE simply because they used engineering controls. Those who did modify their PPE choices when employing engineering controls used tractors with enclosed cabs and/or were vegetable growers.
在三个州对702名持证农药施用者进行了一项便利调查,以评估16种工程控制措施和13种个人防护装备(PPE)的使用情况。结果显示,16种工程设备中有8种被超过50%的受访者采用。研究发现,作物类型、农业经营规模和农药施用设备类型会影响工程控制措施的采用。在大型农场工作的施用者、喷杆式和液压喷雾器的使用者以及大田作物种植者更有可能使用工程设备。受访者报告称个人防护装备的使用率很高,其中耐化学手套的合规率最高。报告显示,佩戴合适头部装备的农药施用者有所增加。大多数受访者不会仅仅因为使用了工程控制措施就减少个人防护装备的使用。那些在采用工程控制措施时确实改变了个人防护装备选择的人,使用的是带有封闭驾驶室的拖拉机和/或从事蔬菜种植。