SADC Foot and Mouth Disease Project, Private Bag 0095, Gaborone, Botswana.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009 Mar;76(1):129-34. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v76i1.76.
The present international approach to management of transboundary animal diseases (TADs) is based on the assumption that most can be eradicated; consequently, that is the usual objective adopted by international organizations concerned with animal health. However, for sub-Saharan Africa and southern Africa more particularly, eradication of most TADs is impossible for the foreseeable future for a variety of technical, financial and logistical reasons. Compounding this, the present basis for access to international markets for products derived from animals requires that the area of origin (country or zone) is free from trade-influencing TADs. The ongoing development of transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs), extending across huge areas of southern Africa, therefore presents a development conundrum because it makes creation of geographic areas free from TADs more difficult and brings development based on wildlife conservation on the one hand and that based on livestock production on the other into sharp conflict. Sub-Saharan Africa is consequently confronted by a complex problem that contributes significantly to retarded rural development which, in turn, impedes poverty alleviation. In southern Africa specifically, foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) presents the greatest problem in relation to access to international markets for animal products. However, it is argued that this problem could be overcome by a combination between (1) implementation of a commodity-based approach to trade in products derived from animals and (2) amendment of the international standards for FMD specifically (i.e. the FMD chapter in the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health [OIE]) so that occurrence of SAT serotype viruses in free-living African buffalo need not necessarily mean exclusion of areas where buffalo occur from international markets for animal products. This would overcome a presently intractable constraint to market access for southern African countries and enable conservation and livestock production to be more effectively integrated, to the benefit of both.
目前,针对跨境动物疾病(TADs)的国际管理方法基于这样一种假设,即大多数 TADs 可以被根除;因此,这也是国际动物卫生组织通常采用的目标。然而,对于撒哈拉以南非洲和南部非洲来说,由于各种技术、财务和后勤方面的原因,在可预见的未来,大多数 TADs 的根除是不可能的。更糟糕的是,目前进入国际市场的动物产品的准入依据要求源自动物的产品的起源地(国家或地区)没有影响贸易的 TADs。正在进行的跨界自然保护地(TFCAs)的开发,跨越了南部非洲的大片地区,因此带来了一个发展难题,因为这使得创建没有 TADs 的地理区域更加困难,一方面是基于野生动物保护的发展,另一方面是基于畜牧业生产的发展,这两者之间存在尖锐的冲突。因此,撒哈拉以南非洲面临着一个复杂的问题,这对农村发展的滞后产生了重大影响,而农村发展的滞后又阻碍了减贫。在南部非洲,口蹄疫(FMD)是进入国际动物产品市场的最大问题。然而,有人认为,通过以下两种方法的结合,可以解决这个问题:(1)对源自动物的产品的贸易实施以商品为基础的方法;(2)具体地修正口蹄疫的国际标准(即世界动物卫生组织 [OIE] 的陆生动物卫生法典中的口蹄疫一章),以便在自由放养的非洲水牛中出现 SAT 血清型病毒不一定意味着必须将水牛出没的地区排除在国际动物产品市场之外。这将克服南部非洲国家目前在市场准入方面的一个难以克服的限制,使保护和畜牧业生产能够更有效地结合起来,从而造福于双方。