MacGowan A P, Marshall R J, Cowling P, Reeves D S
Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jan;44(1):61-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.1.61.
Five hundred and twenty two clinical urine specimens submitted for routine microbiological examination were tested in parallel by conventional microscopy and culture and for lipopolysaccharide antibodies by an enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) to assess the ELISA as a screen for urinary tract infection. When the ELISA alone was compared with routine methods the specificity sensitivity, and predictive value of positive and negative tests was 73.2%, 75.7%, 51.1% and 38.5%. For ELISA with microscopy the same variables were 71.1%, 82.2%, and 92.4% and 94.7%, respectively. The ELISA absorbency increased with increasing bacterial numbers, but results varied widely. Only 65.4% of urines which contained greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria/ml were positive by ELISA; 36.8% of urines with less than 10(3) bacteria/ml were positive by ELISA; 100% of greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria/ml cultures of Pseudomonas sp (n = 4), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), and Streptococcus faecalis (n = 2) were positive by ELISA but only 71.4% of Proteus sp (n = 7), 61.4% coliforms (n = 70), and 25% of coagulase negative staphylococci (n = 4). It is concluded that further development is required before the ELISA can be used for routine screening for urinary tract infection.
对提交进行常规微生物学检查的522份临床尿液标本,同时采用传统显微镜检查和培养方法以及酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测脂多糖抗体,以评估ELISA作为尿路感染筛查方法的效果。当单独将ELISA与常规方法进行比较时,阳性和阴性检测的特异性、敏感性以及预测值分别为73.2%、75.7%、51.1%和38.5%。对于ELISA与显微镜检查联合使用的情况,相同变量分别为71.1%、82.2%、92.4%和94.7%。ELISA吸光度随细菌数量增加而升高,但结果差异很大。每毫升尿液中细菌数大于或等于10⁵的尿液,ELISA检测阳性率仅为65.4%;每毫升尿液中细菌数少于10³的尿液,ELISA检测阳性率为36.8%;铜绿假单胞菌(n = 4)、金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 3)和粪肠球菌(n = 2)每毫升培养物中细菌数大于或等于10⁵时,ELISA检测阳性率为100%,但变形杆菌属(n = 7)的阳性率仅为71.4%,大肠菌群(n = 70)为61.4%,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(n = 4)为25%。结论是,在ELISA可用于尿路感染的常规筛查之前,还需要进一步改进。