Woodman C J, Yates M, Williams D R, Ward K, Jordan J, Luesley D
Department of Social Medicine, Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jan;98(1):21-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10305.x.
The sampling efficacy of the Ayre and Rocket cervical spatulas was compared in a randomized controlled trial involving 533 women who were attending a colposcopy clinic either for investigation of cytological abnormality or for review after treatment of CIN. Smears were compared with respect to the presence of cytological abnormality and two types of normal cervical epithelial cells (endocervical and immature metaplastic cells) which are considered indicators of adequate cytological sampling. Smears taken with the Rocket spatula were significantly less likely to contain immature metaplastic cells (95% CI on difference in proportion; 5-30%), but more likely to contain endocervical cells (95% CI 16-36%). No significant difference was found in the proportion of smears containing one or other type of indicator cell or in the yield of abnormal smears. It is concluded that the Rocket spatula offered no advantage when used in these circumstances. This study illustrates how spurious conclusions of sampling efficacy can be drawn if only one type of indicator cell is used as an endpoint.
在一项随机对照试验中,对533名因细胞学异常接受阴道镜检查或在CIN治疗后接受复查的女性,比较了艾尔(Ayre)宫颈刮板和火箭(Rocket)宫颈刮板的取样效果。根据细胞学异常的存在情况以及两种正常宫颈上皮细胞(宫颈管内膜细胞和未成熟化生细胞,它们被视为足够的细胞学取样指标)对涂片进行比较。用火箭刮板采集的涂片含有未成熟化生细胞的可能性显著降低(比例差异的95%置信区间为5%-30%),但含有宫颈管内膜细胞的可能性更高(95%置信区间为16%-36%)。在含有一种或另一种指标细胞的涂片比例或异常涂片的检出率方面未发现显著差异。得出的结论是,在这些情况下使用火箭刮板没有优势。这项研究表明,如果仅将一种类型的指标细胞用作终点,可能会得出关于取样效果的虚假结论。