Suppr超能文献

老年日间医院的有效性。

Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital.

作者信息

Eagle D J, Guyatt G H, Patterson C, Turpie I, Sackett B, Singer J

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1991 Mar 15;144(6):699-704.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a difference in the quality of life between elderly patients managed in a day hospital and those receiving conventional care.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; assessment upon entry to study and at 3, 6 and 12 months afterward.

SETTING

Geriatrician referral-based secondary care.

PATIENTS

A total of 113 consecutively referred elderly patients with deteriorating functional status believed to have rehabilitation potential; 55 were assessed and treated by an interdisciplinary team in a day hospital (treatment group), and 58 were assessed in an inpatient unit or an outpatient clinic or were discharged early with appropriate community services (control group).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Barthel Index, Rand Questionnaire, Global Health Question and Geriatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQLQ).

MAIN RESULTS

Eight study subjects and four control subjects died; the difference was insignificant. Functional status deteriorated over time in the two groups; although the difference was not significant there was less deterioration in the control group. The GQLQ scores indicated no significant difference between the two groups in the ability to perform daily living activities and in the alleviation of symptoms over time but did show a trend favouring the control group. The GQLQ scores did indicate a significant difference in favour of the control group in the effect of treatment on emotions (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The care received at the day hospital did not improve functional status or quality of life of elderly patients as compared with the otherwise excellent geriatric outpatient care.

摘要

目的

确定日间医院管理的老年患者与接受传统护理的老年患者在生活质量上是否存在差异。

设计

随机对照试验;在研究入组时以及之后3个月、6个月和12个月进行评估。

背景

基于老年病专家转诊的二级护理。

患者

共有113名连续转诊的功能状态恶化但被认为有康复潜力的老年患者;55名在日间医院由多学科团队进行评估和治疗(治疗组),58名在住院部或门诊接受评估,或通过适当的社区服务提前出院(对照组)。

观察指标

巴氏指数、兰德问卷、总体健康问题和老年生活质量问卷(GQLQ)。

主要结果

8名研究对象和4名对照对象死亡;差异无统计学意义。两组的功能状态均随时间恶化;虽然差异不显著,但对照组的恶化程度较小。GQLQ评分显示,两组在日常生活活动能力和症状缓解方面随时间推移无显著差异,但确实显示出有利于对照组的趋势。GQLQ评分确实表明,在治疗对情绪的影响方面,对照组有显著差异(p = 0.009)。

结论

与其他出色的老年门诊护理相比,日间医院提供的护理并未改善老年患者的功能状态或生活质量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.老年人的日间医院护理与其他护理形式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD001730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub3.
7
Day hospitals for elderly people.老年人日间医院。
BMJ. 1992 Jul 4;305(6844):55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.55-b.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验