• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital.老年日间医院的有效性。
CMAJ. 1991 Mar 15;144(6):699-704.
2
A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department--the DEED II study.急诊科老年患者出院后综合老年评估与多学科干预的随机对照试验——DEED II研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1417-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52401.x.
3
A randomized comparison of care provided by a clinical nurse specialist, an inpatient team, and a day patient team in rheumatoid arthritis.临床护理专家、住院团队和日间患者团队对类风湿性关节炎患者护理的随机对照比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Oct 15;47(5):525-31. doi: 10.1002/art.10665.
4
Delivering effective primary care to older adults: a randomized, controlled trial of the senior resource team at group health cooperative.为老年人提供有效的初级保健:团体健康合作社高级资源团队的一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1748-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01416.x.
5
Effectiveness of a group outpatient visit model for chronically ill older health maintenance organization members: a 2-year randomized trial of the cooperative health care clinic.团体门诊模式对患有慢性病的老年健康维护组织成员的有效性:合作医疗诊所的一项为期两年的随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1463-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52408.x.
6
Substitutive "hospital at home" versus inpatient care for elderly patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective randomized, controlled trial.替代性“居家医院”模式与慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重老年患者住院治疗的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):493-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01562.x. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
7
Longitudinal assessment of psychotherapeutic day hospital treatment for elderly patients with depression.老年抑郁症患者心理治疗日间医院治疗的纵向评估
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;23(9):949-56. doi: 10.1002/gps.2016.
8
Outcomes of community-based social service interventions in homebound elders.居家老年人社区社会服务干预的效果
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;23(4):427-32. doi: 10.1002/gps.1898.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and home-based rehabilitation for elderly people with a history of recurrent non-elective hospital admissions.对有非择期反复住院史的老年人进行综合老年评估和居家康复治疗。
Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35(5):487-91. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl049. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
10
Fewer emergency readmissions and better quality of life for older adults at risk of hospital readmission: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a 24-week exercise and telephone follow-up program.降低有再次入院风险的老年人的急诊再入院率并改善其生活质量:一项随机对照试验,以确定一项为期24周的运动和电话随访计划的有效性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):395-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02138.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Rehabilitation potential in older people living with frailty: a systematic mapping review.衰弱老年人的康复潜力:系统制图回顾。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02498-y.
2
Interventions to Prevent or Delay Long-Term Nursing Home Placement for Adults with Impairments-a Systematic Review of Reviews.预防或延缓残障成年人长期入住养老院的干预措施——一项综述的系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2118-2129. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05568-5. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
3
Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care.老年人的日间医院护理与其他护理形式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD001730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub3.
4
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement.地方卫生机构与地方政府机构为改善健康状况而开展合作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007825.pub6.
5
Systematic review of day hospital care for elderly people. The Day Hospital Group.老年人日间医院护理的系统评价。日间医院小组。
BMJ. 1999 Mar 27;318(7187):837-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7187.837.
6
Assessing assessment: evaluating geriatric technology.评估评估:评估老年技术。
CMAJ. 1993 Mar 15;148(6):897-9, 902-4.
7
Day hospitals for elderly people.老年人日间医院。
BMJ. 1992 Jul 4;305(6844):55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.55-b.
8
The Bradford community stroke trial: results at six months.布拉德福德社区中风试验:六个月时的结果。
BMJ. 1992 Apr 25;304(6834):1085-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6834.1085.

本文引用的文献

1
ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes.中风患者的日常生活活动能力状况:三种标准指标的相对优点
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Aug;61(8):355-8.
2
Effects and costs of day-care services for the chronically ill: a randomized experiment.慢性病日托服务的效果与成本:一项随机试验。
Med Care. 1980 Jun;18(6):567-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198006000-00001.
3
Day hospital rehabilitation--effectiveness and cost in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial.日间医院康复——对老年人的有效性及成本:一项随机对照试验
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1209.
4
A methodological framework for assessing health indices.一种评估健康指数的方法框架。
J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0.
5
Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.在临床试验中测量特定疾病的生活质量。
CMAJ. 1986 Apr 15;134(8):889-95.
6
The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.MOS简式一般健康调查。患者群体中的信度与效度。
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007.
7
Day hospitals' cost and effectiveness: a summary.日间医院的成本与效益:综述
Gerontologist. 1987 Dec;27(6):735-40. doi: 10.1093/geront/27.6.735.

老年日间医院的有效性。

Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital.

作者信息

Eagle D J, Guyatt G H, Patterson C, Turpie I, Sackett B, Singer J

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1991 Mar 15;144(6):699-704.

PMID:1998929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1453052/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a difference in the quality of life between elderly patients managed in a day hospital and those receiving conventional care.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; assessment upon entry to study and at 3, 6 and 12 months afterward.

SETTING

Geriatrician referral-based secondary care.

PATIENTS

A total of 113 consecutively referred elderly patients with deteriorating functional status believed to have rehabilitation potential; 55 were assessed and treated by an interdisciplinary team in a day hospital (treatment group), and 58 were assessed in an inpatient unit or an outpatient clinic or were discharged early with appropriate community services (control group).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Barthel Index, Rand Questionnaire, Global Health Question and Geriatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQLQ).

MAIN RESULTS

Eight study subjects and four control subjects died; the difference was insignificant. Functional status deteriorated over time in the two groups; although the difference was not significant there was less deterioration in the control group. The GQLQ scores indicated no significant difference between the two groups in the ability to perform daily living activities and in the alleviation of symptoms over time but did show a trend favouring the control group. The GQLQ scores did indicate a significant difference in favour of the control group in the effect of treatment on emotions (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The care received at the day hospital did not improve functional status or quality of life of elderly patients as compared with the otherwise excellent geriatric outpatient care.

摘要

目的

确定日间医院管理的老年患者与接受传统护理的老年患者在生活质量上是否存在差异。

设计

随机对照试验;在研究入组时以及之后3个月、6个月和12个月进行评估。

背景

基于老年病专家转诊的二级护理。

患者

共有113名连续转诊的功能状态恶化但被认为有康复潜力的老年患者;55名在日间医院由多学科团队进行评估和治疗(治疗组),58名在住院部或门诊接受评估,或通过适当的社区服务提前出院(对照组)。

观察指标

巴氏指数、兰德问卷、总体健康问题和老年生活质量问卷(GQLQ)。

主要结果

8名研究对象和4名对照对象死亡;差异无统计学意义。两组的功能状态均随时间恶化;虽然差异不显著,但对照组的恶化程度较小。GQLQ评分显示,两组在日常生活活动能力和症状缓解方面随时间推移无显著差异,但确实显示出有利于对照组的趋势。GQLQ评分确实表明,在治疗对情绪的影响方面,对照组有显著差异(p = 0.009)。

结论

与其他出色的老年门诊护理相比,日间医院提供的护理并未改善老年患者的功能状态或生活质量。