Young J B, Forster A
Department of Health Care for the Elderly, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford.
BMJ. 1992 Apr 25;304(6834):1085-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6834.1085.
Comparison of day hospital attendance and home physiotherapy for stroke patients leaving hospital to determine which service produces greater functional and social improvement for the patient, reduces emotional stress for the care giver, and lessens the need for community support.
Stratified, randomised trial of stroke patients attending day hospital two days a week or receiving home treatment from a community physiotherapist. The six month assessment results are reported in this paper.
Patients over 60 years old resident within the Bradford metropolitan district discharged home after a new stroke with residual disability.
Four day hospitals in two health authorities and domiciliary work undertaken by experienced community physiotherapists.
Barthel index, functional ambulatory categories, Motor Club assessment, Frenchay activities index, and Nottingham health profile were used. Carers' stress was indicated by the general health questionnaire. Treatment given and community care provided were recorded.
Of 124 patients recruited, 108 were available for reassessment at six months. Both treatment groups had significantly improved in functional abilities between discharge and six months. The improvements were significantly greater for patients treated at home (Mann-Whitney test; Barthel index, median difference 2 (95% confidence interval 0 to 3) p = 0.01; Motor Club assessment, median difference 2 (1 to 5), p = 0.01). The home treated patients received less treatment (median difference 16 (11 to 21) treatments, p less than 0.001). More than a third of patients in both groups showed depressed mood, and a quarter of care givers were emotionally distressed.
Home physiotherapy seems to be slightly more effective and more resource efficient than day hospital attendance and should be the preferred rehabilitation method for aftercare of stroke patients. New strategies are needed to address psychosocial function for both patients and care givers.
比较中风出院患者日间医院就诊和家庭物理治疗情况,以确定哪种服务能为患者带来更大的功能和社会改善,减轻护理人员的情绪压力,并减少对社区支持的需求。
对每周两天到日间医院就诊或接受社区物理治疗师家庭治疗的中风患者进行分层随机试验。本文报告了六个月的评估结果。
居住在布拉德福德都会区、60岁以上、新发中风且有残留残疾后出院回家的患者。
两个卫生当局下属的四家日间医院以及由经验丰富的社区物理治疗师开展的上门服务。
采用巴氏指数、功能性步行分类、运动俱乐部评估、弗伦奇活动指数和诺丁汉健康概况。用一般健康问卷来表明护理人员的压力。记录所提供的治疗和社区护理情况。
在招募的124名患者中,108名患者在六个月时可进行重新评估。两个治疗组在出院至六个月期间功能能力均有显著改善。在家接受治疗的患者改善更为显著(曼-惠特尼检验;巴氏指数,中位数差异为2(95%置信区间0至3),p = 0.01;运动俱乐部评估,中位数差异为2(1至5),p = 0.01)。在家接受治疗的患者接受的治疗较少(中位数差异为16(11至21)次治疗,p < 0.001)。两组中超过三分之一的患者表现出情绪低落,四分之一的护理人员存在情绪困扰。
家庭物理治疗似乎比日间医院就诊略更有效且资源利用更高效,应成为中风患者后续护理的首选康复方法。需要新的策略来解决患者和护理人员的心理社会功能问题。