Minimally Invasive Surgery, Avendaño Medical Center, Lima, Peru.
Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1092-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19-83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I-II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 +/- 34.6 min (range = 75-195)] compared to the TV route [147 +/- 31.5 min (range = 95-220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.5, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.6, chi(2) test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.
腹部手术长期以来一直通过前腹壁进行。自 20 世纪 80 年代的首次报道以来,腹腔镜已成为胆囊切除术的标准,与开放手术相比具有许多优势。现在,通过自然腔道进入腹腔可能会通过减少或避免腹部切口进一步降低手术的侵袭性。已经描述了几种通向腹腔的腔道途径:经胃、经阴道、经膀胱和经结肠。尽管大多数在猪模型中的经验表明这些方法是可行的,但很少有外科医生报告在人类中进行这些方法的经验。作者介绍了他们在人类中经胃(TG)和经阴道(TV)胆囊切除术的完整早期经验。
从 2007 年 1 月至 2009 年 1 月,39 名患者(4 名男性和 35 名女性)接受了混合 NOTES 手术。平均年龄为 46 岁(范围= 19-83)。体重指数范围为 20 至 41,ASA 为 I-II。27 名患者行经胃(TG)胆囊切除术,12 名患者行经阴道(TV)胆囊切除术。
平均手术时间为 140 分钟。尽管 TG 组的手术时间略短[005B137 +/- 34.6 min(范围= 75-195)],但与 TV 组[147 +/- 31.5 min(范围= 95-220)]相比,无明显差异(p = 0.5,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。患者在 1 小时内开始饮用液体,并在 2 小时后出院,除了最后 11 名 TG 患者,他们因参加单独的方案而在 24 小时后回家。发现总发病率为 20%,死亡率为 0。TG 和 TV 组的并发症发生率分别为 18%(5/27)和 25%(3/12),无统计学意义(p = 0.6,卡方检验)。75%的并发症(6/8)发生在我们经验的第一年,25%(2/8)发生在第二年。
经胃和经阴道胆囊切除术是可行的。尽管这些NOTES 手术是腹腔镜辅助的,并且使用了当前的柔性内窥镜,但似乎有可能有一天可以不进行皮肤切口就进行主要的腹腔内手术。然而,必须遵循学习曲线,尽管没有主要的胆管损伤,但仍有 NOTES 相关的并发症。这些无切口手术的趋势需要在涉及外科医生和设备制造商的跨学科环境中进行协调研究,以进一步确定自然腔道手术的适当适应证、禁忌证和应用。