Suppr超能文献

电针对鼻中隔偏曲矫正术后疼痛缓解的作用:一项随机对照研究。

Electro-acupuncture for pain relief after nasal septoplasty: a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Shiraz Medical University, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Jan;16(1):53-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0288.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electro-acupuncture (EA) can be effective in some pain conditions, but still there have been no randomized controlled studies of EA for treatment of acute postoperative pain in nasal septoplasty. Therefore, we did a study to test whether EA of specific points is superior to sham acupuncture for complementary analgesia after nasal septoplasty.

METHODS

Ninety (90) patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status of I-II scheduled for elective septoplasty were randomly allocated to acupuncture group or control group. Postoperative pain was treated with intravenous meperidine. The time to the first analgesic request, and pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS-100) were used to evaluate postoperative pain, and the amount of postoperative meperidine and incidence of analgesia related to side-effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain intensity on VAS-100 and respiratory depression were similar in both groups (p > 0.05), but nausea and vomiting were less in the acupuncture group than in the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from our study demonstrate that both uses of EA and 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine given intraoperatively resulted in a similar postoperative pain score, and meperidine was not given in any patient in the two groups during postoperative period because the VAS scores of all patients were less than 40 mm.

摘要

背景

电针(EA)在某些疼痛情况下可能有效,但对于鼻中隔成形术后急性疼痛的治疗,仍然没有随机对照研究证明 EA 有效。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以测试特定穴位的 EA 是否优于假针刺作为鼻中隔成形术后的辅助镇痛。

方法

90 名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为 I-II 级的择期鼻中隔成形术患者被随机分配到针刺组或对照组。术后疼痛采用静脉注射哌替啶治疗。使用首次镇痛请求时间和 100 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS-100)上的疼痛强度来评估术后疼痛,并记录术后哌替啶用量和与副作用相关的镇痛发生率。

结果

两组患者的 VAS-100 术后疼痛强度和呼吸抑制相似(p>0.05),但针刺组恶心呕吐发生率低于对照组(p<0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,EA 和术中给予 0.1mg/kg IV 吗啡的使用都导致了相似的术后疼痛评分,并且在两组患者中,由于所有患者的 VAS 评分均小于 40mm,因此在术后期间均未给予哌替啶。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验