Department of Anesthesiology & Research Institute of Acupuncture Anesthesia, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0285943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285943. eCollection 2023.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting are typical postsurgical complications. Drug therapy is only partially effective. The goal of our meta-analysis is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting and to score the quality of evidence supporting this concept.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 19, 2020.
Twenty-six studies (2064 patients) were included. Compared with control treatment, electrical acupoint stimulation reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.57, P < 0.001), postoperative nausea (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.64, P < 0.001) and postoperative vomiting (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.70, P < 0.001). Electrical acupoint stimulation also reduced the number of patients requiring antiemetic rescue (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.85, P = 0.004). No differences in adverse events were observed. Subgroup analysis showed that both electroacupuncture (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, P < 0.001) and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58, P < 0.001) had significant effects. Electrical acupoint stimulation was effective whether administered preoperatively (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.60, P < 0.001), postoperatively (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.76, P < 0.001), or perioperatively (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.67, P < 0.001). The quality of evidence was moderate to low.
Electrical acupoint stimulation probably reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting, and reduce the number of patients requiring antiemetic rescue, with few adverse events.
术后恶心和呕吐是典型的术后并发症。药物治疗仅部分有效。我们的荟萃分析旨在系统评估电穴位刺激治疗术后恶心和呕吐的疗效和安全性,并对支持这一概念的证据质量进行评分。
从成立到 2020 年 3 月 19 日,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。
纳入 26 项研究(2064 例患者)。与对照治疗相比,电穴位刺激降低了术后恶心和呕吐的发生率(RR0.49,95%CI0.41 至 0.57,P<0.001)、术后恶心(RR0.55,95%CI0.47 至 0.64,P<0.001)和术后呕吐(RR0.56,95%CI0.45 至 0.70,P<0.001)。电穴位刺激还减少了需要止吐药解救的患者人数(RR0.60,95%CI0.43 至 0.85,P=0.004)。未观察到不良反应的差异。亚组分析表明,电针(RR0.58,95%CI0.46 至 0.74,P<0.001)和经皮电穴位刺激(RR0.44,95%CI0.34 至 0.58,P<0.001)均有显著效果。电穴位刺激无论是在术前(RR0.40,95%CI0.27 至 0.60,P<0.001)、术后(RR0.59,95%CI0.46 至 0.76,P<0.001)还是围手术期(RR0.50,95%CI0.37 至 0.67,P<0.001)给药,均有效。证据质量为中低。
电穴位刺激可能减少术后恶心和呕吐、术后恶心、术后呕吐的发生率,并减少需要止吐药解救的患者人数,且不良反应较少。