• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理三个欧洲国家严重低血糖症的成本。

Costs of managing severe hypoglycaemia in three European countries.

机构信息

Novo Nordisk A/S, Krogshøjvej 49, Bagsværd, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):281-90. doi: 10.3111/13696990903336597.

DOI:10.3111/13696990903336597
PMID:20001570
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the costs of severe hypoglycaemic events (SHEs) in diabetes patients in Germany, Spain and the UK.

METHODS

Healthcare resource use was measured by surveying 639 patients aged ≥ 16 years, receiving insulin for type 1 (n=319) or type 2 diabetes (n=320), who experienced ≥ 1 SHE in the preceding year. Patients were grouped by location of SHE treatment: group 1, community (family/domestic); group 2, community (healthcare professional); group 3, hospital. Costs were calculated from published unit costs applied to estimated resource use. Costs per SHE were derived from patient numbers per subgroup. Weighted average costs were derived using a prevalence database.

RESULTS

Hospital treatment was a major cost in all countries. In Germany and Spain, costs per SHE for type 1 patients differed from those for type 2 patients in each group. Average SHE treatment costs were higher for patients with type 2 diabetes (Germany, €533; Spain, €691; UK, €537) than type 1 diabetes patients (€441, €577 and €236, respectively). Telephone calls, visits to doctors, blood glucose monitoring and patient education contributed substantially to costs for non-hospitalised patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SHEs adds significantly to healthcare costs. Average costs were lower for type 1 than for insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, in all three countries.

摘要

目的

评估德国、西班牙和英国糖尿病患者严重低血糖事件(SHEs)的成本。

方法

通过调查 639 名年龄≥16 岁、正在接受 1 型(n=319)或 2 型(n=320)糖尿病胰岛素治疗且在前一年中经历≥1 次 SHE 的患者,衡量医疗资源的使用情况。根据 SHE 治疗地点将患者分为三组:组 1,社区(家庭/国内);组 2,社区(医疗专业人员);组 3,医院。根据公布的单位成本计算成本,应用于估计的资源使用情况。从每个亚组的患者数量中得出每次 SHE 的成本。使用患病率数据库得出加权平均成本。

结果

在所有国家,医院治疗都是主要的成本。在德国和西班牙,1 型患者的每组 SHE 成本与 2 型患者的成本不同。2 型糖尿病患者(德国为 533 欧元,西班牙为 691 欧元,英国为 537 欧元)的平均 SHE 治疗成本高于 1 型糖尿病患者(分别为 441 欧元、577 欧元和 236 欧元)。对于未住院的患者,电话咨询、医生就诊、血糖监测和患者教育对成本有重大贡献。

结论

SHE 治疗显著增加了医疗保健成本。在所有三个国家,1 型糖尿病的平均成本均低于胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病。

相似文献

1
Costs of managing severe hypoglycaemia in three European countries.管理三个欧洲国家严重低血糖症的成本。
J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):281-90. doi: 10.3111/13696990903336597.
2
Management of severe hypoglycaemia: cultural similarities, differences and resource consumption in three European countries.严重低血糖管理:三个欧洲国家的文化相似性、差异性和资源消耗。
J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):269-80. doi: 10.3111/13696990903310501.
3
Medical resource use, disturbance of daily life and burden of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with diabetes: results from a European online survey.胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的医疗资源利用、日常生活干扰和低血糖负担:来自欧洲在线调查的结果。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Feb;13(1):123-30. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.80.
4
Economic impact of hypoglycemia on healthcare in Spain.低血糖对西班牙医疗保健的经济影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Dec;10(6):649-60. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.73.
5
Healthcare resource use, direct and indirect costs of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and nationwide projections. Results of the HYPOS-1 study.1型和2型糖尿病患者低血糖的医疗资源使用、直接和间接成本以及全国预测。HYPOS-1研究结果
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Mar;27(3):209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Approach to assessing the economic impact of insulin-related hypoglycaemia using the novel Local Impact of Hypoglycaemia Tool.使用新型低血糖局部影响工具评估胰岛素相关低血糖经济影响的方法
Diabet Med. 2015 Sep;32(9):1156-66. doi: 10.1111/dme.12771. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
A cost of illness study of hypoglycaemic events in insulin-treated diabetes in the Netherlands.荷兰胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者低血糖事件的疾病成本研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e019864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019864.
8
Association of hypoglycaemia severity with clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin.低血糖严重程度与美国使用基础胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者的临床、患者报告和经济结局的相关性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1156-1165. doi: 10.1111/dom.13208. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Cost of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes in Spain and the cost-effectiveness of insulin lispro compared with regular human insulin in preventing severe hypoglycaemia.西班牙1型糖尿病患者严重低血糖的成本以及赖脯胰岛素与常规人胰岛素相比在预防严重低血糖方面的成本效益
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jul;62(7):1026-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01783.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
10
Differences in rates of hypoglycemia and health care costs in patients treated with insulin aspart in pens versus vials.使用笔型注射器和瓶装胰岛素治疗的患者在低血糖发生率和医疗成本方面的差异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Oct;29(10):1287-96. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.825590. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-utility analysis of long-acting insulin analogues (detemir, glargine and degludec) for the treatment of adult type 1 diabetes in South Africa.长效胰岛素类似物(地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素和德谷胰岛素)用于治疗南非成年1型糖尿病的成本效用分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Mar 23;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00615-x.
2
Cost of hospitalization and length of stay of hypoglycemic events in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.糖尿病住院患者低血糖事件的住院费用及住院时长:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 14;104(11):e41840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041840.
3
The Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide Versus Lower-Cost Liraglutide in the UK.
口服司美格鲁肽与低成本利拉鲁肽在英国的长期成本效益
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Apr;16(4):613-628. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01691-1. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy.英国早期使用口服司美格鲁肽:与继续使用二甲双胍和 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗相比的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 29;13(9):e070473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070473.
5
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg Versus Liraglutide 1.8 mg: A Health Economic Analysis in the UK.评估每周一次注射1毫克司美格鲁肽与1.8毫克利拉鲁肽的长期成本效益:英国的一项卫生经济学分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Jun;14(6):1005-1021. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01408-2. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
6
Epidemiological, Social and Economic Burden of Severe Hypoglycaemia in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Portugal: A Structured Literature Review.葡萄牙糖尿病患者严重低血糖的流行病学、社会和经济负担:一项结构化文献综述
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Feb;14(2):265-291. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01358-1. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
7
Economic Burden of Severe Hypoglycemia Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病患者严重低血糖的经济负担
Cureus. 2022 Nov 25;14(11):e31889. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31889. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as a Treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Health-Economic Analysis of DAPA-CKD.达格列净治疗慢性肾脏病的成本效益:DAPA-CKD 的健康经济学分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Dec;17(12):1730-1741. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03790322. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Flash Glucose Monitoring System for People with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Intensive Insulin Treatment.2型糖尿病强化胰岛素治疗患者使用动态血糖监测系统的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Dec;13(11-12):1933-1945. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01325-w. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
The long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg vs. dulaglutide 3 mg and 4.5 mg in the UK.英国每周一次司美格鲁肽 1 毫克与每周一次度拉鲁肽 3 毫克和 4.5 毫克的长期成本效益比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Aug;24(6):895-907. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01514-1. Epub 2022 Sep 17.