• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 X 光片和两种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。

Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators.

机构信息

Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana, México.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2010 Jan;43(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01620.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01620.x
PMID:20002800
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the Root ZX and Elements-Diagnostic electronic apex locators when compared with radiographs for locating the canal terminus or minor foramen.

METHODOLOGY

The canal terminus of 482 canals in 160 maxillary and mandibular teeth was located in vivo with both locators and radiographically. After extraction, the actual location of the minor foramen was determined visually and with magnification. A paired samples t-test, chi-square test and a repeated measure anova at the 0.05 level of significance were used to determine differences between the groups.

RESULTS

The Root ZX located the minor foramen correctly 68% of the time in anterior and premolar teeth, and 58% of the time in molar teeth. The Elements-Diagnostic located the minor foramen correctly 58% of the time in anterior and premolar teeth and 49% of the time in molar teeth. Radiographs located the minor foramen correctly 20% of the time in anterior and premolar teeth and 11% of the time in molar teeth. There was no statistically significant difference between the two locators, but there was a significant difference between them and radiographs. For all teeth, the measurements made by the apex locators were within +/-0.5 mm of the minor foramen 100% of the time, whereas for the radiographs, the measurements were within this range only 15% of the time. This difference was significant (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Measuring the location of the minor foramen using the two apex locators was more accurate than radiographs and would reduce the risk of instrumenting and filling beyond the apical foramen.

摘要

目的

评估 Root ZX 和 Elements-Diagnostic 电子根尖定位仪在定位根管末端或小根尖孔时与 X 光片相比的准确性。

方法

在体内使用这两种定位器和 X 光片定位了 160 颗上颌和下颌牙齿的 482 个根管的根尖末端。在拔牙后,通过肉眼和放大观察确定小根尖孔的实际位置。使用配对样本 t 检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析,在 0.05 的显著性水平上比较组间差异。

结果

Root ZX 在 100%的前牙和前磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 68%,在 100%的磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 58%。Elements-Diagnostic 在 100%的前牙和前磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 58%,在 100%的磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 49%。X 光片在 100%的前牙和前磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 20%,在 100%的磨牙中正确定位小根尖孔的比例为 11%。这两种定位器之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但与 X 光片之间有显著差异。对于所有牙齿,根尖定位器的测量值与小根尖孔的距离在 +/-0.5mm 内的比例为 100%,而 X 光片的测量值在这个范围内的比例仅为 15%。这种差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。

结论

使用这两种根尖定位器测量小根尖孔的位置比 X 光片更准确,可以降低器械超出根尖孔进入和填充的风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators.比较 X 光片和两种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。
Int Endod J. 2010 Jan;43(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01620.x.
2
Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.比较 X 光片和四种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。
Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01855.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
3
An evaluation of two electronic apex locators in a dental student clinic.在牙科学生诊所对两种电子根尖定位仪的评估。
Quintessence Int. 1993 Nov;24(11):803-6.
4
A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.两种电子根尖定位仪的比较:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):362-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01229.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
5
Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth.乳牙根管长度测定中两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的体外评估
Int Endod J. 2008 Apr;41(4):317-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01366.x. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
6
In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的体内比较
Aust Endod J. 2011 Aug;37(2):70-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00217.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
7
Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study.三种电子根尖定位仪在前磨牙和后牙中的准确性:一项离体研究。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):684-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.仅使用根 ZX 根尖定位仪与采用一种新印模技术将根 ZX 根尖定位仪与 X 光片相结合来确定工作长度的体内比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):e79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.009.
9
A Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3 Electronic Apex Locators in Curved Canals of Mandibular Molars.下颌磨牙弯曲根管中 3 种电子根尖定位仪准确性的微计算机断层扫描评估
J Endod. 2018 Dec;44(12):1872-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
The ability of two apex locators to locate the apical foramen: an in vitro study.两种根尖定位仪定位根尖孔的能力:一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):560-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Accuracy of Deep Learning Models and Dental Postgraduate Students in Measuring Working Length on Intraoral Periapical X-rays: An Study.评估深度学习模型和牙科研究生在口腔内根尖片上测量工作长度的准确性:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):15-18. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_274_24. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
The role of imaging in endodontics.影像学在牙髓病学中的作用。
Br Dent J. 2025 Apr;238(7):448-457. doi: 10.1038/s41415-025-8511-z. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.
电子根尖定位仪与数字放射成像在乳牙工作长度测定中准确性的比较评估:一项系统评价
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of six different apex locators in working length determination of molars using intraoral periapical radiographs: An study.使用口腔内根尖片对六种不同根尖定位仪在磨牙工作长度测定中的准确性进行比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):695-700. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_189_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Comparative evaluation of accuracy of working length determination with fifth-generation apex locator using two different techniques: An study.使用两种不同技术对第五代根尖定位仪确定工作长度准确性的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):240-245. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_210_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
6
The Accuracy of Three Apex Locators in Determining the Location of Strip Root Perforation in Different Environments.三种根尖定位仪在不同环境下确定根管侧穿位置的准确性
Iran Endod J. 2021 Summer;16(3):184-188. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i3.32515.
7
Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Root Zx in the Presence of Naocl 2.5% and Chlorhexidine 0.2.在存在2.5%次氯酸钠和0.2%氯己定的情况下对Root Zx准确性的评估。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Nov 1;10(11):e1054-e1057. doi: 10.4317/jced.54193. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Working Length Determination Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Periapical Radiography and Electronic Apex Locator in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A Clinical Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、根尖片和电子根尖定位仪确定根尖周炎患牙工作长度的临床研究
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):164-8. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 May 1.
9
An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by three electronic root canal length measurement devices integrated into endodontic rotary motors.三种集成于牙髓旋转马达的电子根管长度测量装置在体外对工作长度测定的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2303-2308. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1903-3. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
10
Comparison of two electronic apex locators on human cadavers.两种电子根尖定位仪在人体尸体上的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1547-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1644-8. Epub 2015 Nov 4.