• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 X 光片和四种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。

Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Baja California, México.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01855.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01855.x
PMID:21306402
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the Root ZX, Elements-Diagnostic, Precision AL and Raypex 5 electronic apex locators when compared to radiographs for locating the apical constriction.

METHODOLOGY

The apical constriction of 693 canals in 245 maxillary and mandibular teeth was located in vivo with four electronic apex locators (EALs) and radiographically. After extraction the actual location of the apical constriction was determined visually and with magnification. A paired samples t-test, X2 test and a repeated measure anova at the 0.05 level of significance were used to determine differences between the groups.

RESULTS

For anterior teeth, the Root ZX, Elements, Precision AL, Raypex 5 and radiographs located the apical constriction 89.09%, 83.63%, 85.45%, 81.81% and 32.72% of the time, respectively. For premolar teeth, the Root ZX, Elements, Precision AL, Raypex 5 and radiographs located the apical constriction 75%, 61.60%, 64.28%, 61.60% and 32.14% of the time, respectively. For molar teeth, the Root ZX, Elements, Precision AL, Raypex 5 and radiographs located the apical constriction 69.01%, 50.49%, 65.40%, 43.93% and 14.59% of the time, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the four EALs (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Measuring the location of the apical constriction using the four apex locators was more accurate than radiographs and would reduce the risk of instrumenting and filling beyond the apical foramen.

摘要

目的

评估 Root ZX、Elements-Diagnostic、Precision AL 和 Raypex 5 电子根尖定位仪在定位根尖狭窄部时与 X 光片相比的准确性。

方法

对 245 颗上颌和下颌牙齿的 693 个根管进行了活体研究,使用 4 种电子根尖定位仪(EAL)和 X 光片进行了定位。在提取后,通过肉眼和放大观察确定实际的根尖狭窄部位置。采用配对样本 t 检验、X2 检验和重复测量方差分析,在 0.05 的显著性水平上确定组间差异。

结果

对于前牙,Root ZX、Elements、Precision AL、Raypex 5 和 X 光片分别有 89.09%、83.63%、85.45%、81.81%和 32.72%的时间定位到根尖狭窄部。对于前磨牙,Root ZX、Elements、Precision AL、Raypex 5 和 X 光片分别有 75%、61.60%、64.28%、61.60%和 32.14%的时间定位到根尖狭窄部。对于磨牙,Root ZX、Elements、Precision AL、Raypex 5 和 X 光片分别有 69.01%、50.49%、65.40%、43.93%和 14.59%的时间定位到根尖狭窄部。这四种 EAL 之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.05)。

结论

使用这四种根尖定位仪测量根尖狭窄部的位置比 X 光片更准确,可以降低器械超出根尖孔并填充的风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.比较 X 光片和四种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。
Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01855.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
2
Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators.比较 X 光片和两种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。
Int Endod J. 2010 Jan;43(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01620.x.
3
A Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3 Electronic Apex Locators in Curved Canals of Mandibular Molars.下颌磨牙弯曲根管中 3 种电子根尖定位仪准确性的微计算机断层扫描评估
J Endod. 2018 Dec;44(12):1872-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Ex vivo comparison of two electronic apex locators with different scales and frequencies.两种具有不同刻度和频率的电子根尖定位仪的体外比较。
Int Endod J. 2005 Dec;38(12):855-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01004.x.
5
Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30.使用三种电子根尖定位仪(Root ZX、Elements诊断单元和根尖定位仪以及RomiAPEX D-30)评估长度测定的精度。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):e91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
6
An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.仅使用根 ZX 根尖定位仪与采用一种新印模技术将根 ZX 根尖定位仪与 X 光片相结合来确定工作长度的体内比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):e79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.009.
7
In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators.两种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度的体内比较
Int Endod J. 2007 Feb;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01199.x.
8
An ex vivo comparison of root canal length determination by three electronic apex locators at positions short of the apical foramen.三种电子根尖定位仪在根尖孔短距离位置测定根管长度的体外比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Aug;110(2):e57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
9
Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.一种新型根尖定位仪的准确性:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2002 Feb;35(2):186-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00468.x.
10
An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators.3种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度的体外比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Sep;108(3):e147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.电子根尖定位仪与数字放射成像在乳牙工作长度测定中准确性的比较评估:一项系统评价
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Comparative Assessment of Working Length Determination: Apex Locators versus Endomotor with Built-in Apex Locator in Single-Rooted Permanent Teeth.单根恒牙工作长度测定的比较评估:根尖定位仪与内置根尖定位仪的根管马达对比
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2892-S2894. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_487_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Clinicians' perspectives, inducements, preferences, and clinical experiences regarding the use of electronic apex locator and apex locator integrated engine-driven instrumentation: a cross-sectional study.
临床医生对使用电子根尖定位仪和根尖定位仪集成引擎驱动器械的看法、诱因、偏好和临床经验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04710-y.
4
Accuracy of Working Length Measurement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography at Three Field of View Settings, Conventional Radiography, and Electronic Apex Locator: An Ex-vivo Study.三种视野设置下锥形束 CT、常规 X 线摄影和电子根尖定位仪测量工作长度的准确性:一项离体研究。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Aug 22;9(3):266-272. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.97769.
5
Accuracy of the electronic apex locator, tactile, and radiographic methods in working length determination.电子根尖定位仪、触觉法及影像学方法在工作长度测定中的准确性
J Conserv Dent. 2023 May-Jun;26(3):311-315. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_45_23. Epub 2023 May 16.
6
Apexoconnection: A Novel Technique to Determine Working Length.根尖连接:一种确定工作长度的新技术。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 Aug 17;13:353-360. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S316839. eCollection 2021.
7
Influence of embedding media on the accuracy of working length determination by means of apex locator: an ex vivo study.根管工作长度电测仪在不同根管内检测准确性的体外研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):3340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82942-6.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Ipex, Root Zx Mini, and Epex Pro Apex Locators in Teeth with Artificially Created Root Perforations in Presence of Various Intracanal Irrigants.在不同根管冲洗液存在的情况下,比较 Ipex、Root Zx Mini 和 Epex Pro Apex 根管定位仪测量有髓腔穿孔牙准确性的实验研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Mar 19;5(1):6-9. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.07279. eCollection 2020.
9
An in vivo comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining working length using stainless steel and nickel titanium files.使用不锈钢锉和镍钛锉对两种电子根尖定位仪在确定工作长度方面的准确性进行的体内比较。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 May 22;10:75-82. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S158882. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparison of Tentative Radiographic Working Length with and without grid Versus Electronic Apex Locator.使用和不使用格栅的暂定放射影像学工作长度与电子根尖定位仪的比较。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):88-91. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_790_17.