Gutiérrez Peláez Miguel
Clínica La Inmaculada, Carrera 7 N68-70, Bogotá, Cundinamarca 1, Colombia.
Int J Psychoanal. 2009 Dec;90(6):1217-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00190.x.
The author states that it is Ferenczi 's writings of 1931 and 1932 that exhibit the most conspicuous departures from Freud 's ideas and at the same time contain Ferenczi 's most original contributions. The texts concerned - Confusion of tongues between adults and the child (Ferenczi, 1932a), the Clinical Diary (Dupont, 1985), and some of the Notes and fragments (Ferenczi, 1930-32), all of which were published posthumously - present valuable and original theories on trauma which are significant not only in historical terms but also because the ideas concerned are relevant to our conception of clinical psychoanalysis today. The aim of this paper is to give an account of Ferenczi 's trauma theory as it emerges from his writings of 1931-32 and to specify the points on which he differs from Freud.
作者指出,正是费伦齐1931年和1932年的著作展现出与弗洛伊德思想最显著的背离,同时也包含了费伦齐最具原创性的贡献。相关文本——《成人与儿童之间的语言混淆》(费伦齐,1932a)、《临床日记》(杜邦,1985)以及一些《笔记与片段》(费伦齐,1930 - 1932),所有这些都是在他去世后出版的——提出了关于创伤的有价值且原创的理论,这些理论不仅在历史层面具有重要意义,而且因为相关思想与我们当今临床精神分析的概念相关。本文的目的是阐述费伦齐在其1931 - 1932年著作中所呈现的创伤理论,并明确他与弗洛伊德不同的观点。