Blood Systems Research Institute, 270, Masonic Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Transfusion. 2010 Apr;50(4):909-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02526.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
Studies have shown that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) residual risk is higher in Brazilian than in US and European blood donors, probably due to failure to defer at-risk individuals in Brazil. This study assessed the impact of an educational brochure in enhancing blood donors' knowledge about screening test window phase and reducing at-risk individuals from donating.
This trial compared an educational intervention with a blood center's usual practice. The brochure was distributed in alternating months to all donors. After donating, sampled participants completed two questions about their HIV window period knowledge. The impact on HIV risk deferral, leaving without donation, confidential unit exclusion (CUE) use, and test positivity was also analyzed.
From August to November 2007 we evaluated 33,940 donations in the main collection center of Fundação Pró-Sangue/Hemocentro de São Paulo in São Paulo, Brazil. A significant (p < 0.001) pamphlet effect was found on correct responses to both questions assessing HIV window phase knowledge (68.1% vs. 52.9%) and transfusion risk (91.1% vs. 87.2%). After adjusting for sex and age, the pamphlet effect was strongest for people with more than 8 years of education. There was no significant pamphlet effect on HIV risk deferral rate, leaving without donation, use of CUE, or infectious disease rates.
While the educational pamphlet increased window period knowledge, contrary to expectations this information alone was not enough to make donors self-defer or acknowledge their behavioral risk.
研究表明,巴西的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)残余风险高于美国和欧洲的献血者,这可能是由于巴西未能推迟高危个体献血。本研究评估了教育手册对增强献血者对筛查试验窗口期知识的影响,以及减少高危个体献血的效果。
本试验比较了教育干预与血库的常规做法。宣传册在交替月份分发给所有献血者。献血后,抽样参与者完成了两个关于他们 HIV 窗口期知识的问题。还分析了对 HIV 风险延期、未献血、使用机密单位排除(CUE)和检测阳性的影响。
2007 年 8 月至 11 月,我们评估了巴西圣保罗 Fundação Pró-Sangue/Hemocentro de São Paulo 主要采集中心的 33940 份献血。宣传册对评估 HIV 窗口期知识的两个问题的正确回答有显著影响(68.1% vs. 52.9%)和输血风险(91.1% vs. 87.2%)(p < 0.001)。在校正性别和年龄后,教育手册对教育程度超过 8 年的人群的效果最强。宣传册对 HIV 风险延期率、未献血、CUE 使用或传染病率没有显著影响。
虽然教育手册增加了窗口期知识,但与预期相反,仅凭这些信息不足以使献血者自我延期或承认他们的行为风险。