• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用射波刀治疗肺部肿瘤时,蒙特卡罗和光线追踪算法计算的计划剂量分布比较:33 例初步研究。

Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT 06105, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.001
PMID:20004530
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare dose distributions calculated using the Monte Carlo algorithm (MC) and Ray-Trace algorithm (effective path length method, EPL) for CyberKnife treatments of lung tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An acceptable treatment plan is created using Multiplan 2.1 and MC dose calculation. Dose is prescribed to the isodose line encompassing 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) and this is the plan clinically delivered. For comparison, the Ray-Trace algorithm with heterogeneity correction (EPL) is used to recalculate the dose distribution for this plan using the same beams, beam directions, and monitor units (MUs).

RESULTS

The maximum doses calculated by the EPL to target PTV are uniformly larger than the MC plans by up to a factor of 1.63. Up to a factor of four larger maximum dose differences are observed for the critical structures in the chest. More beams traversing larger distances through low density lung are associated with larger differences, consistent with the fact that the EPL overestimates doses in low-density structures and this effect is more pronounced as collimator size decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

We establish that changing the treatment plan calculation algorithm from EPL to MC can produce large differences in target and critical organs' dose coverage. The observed discrepancies are larger for plans using smaller collimator sizes and have strong dependency on the anatomical relationship of target-critical structures.

摘要

目的

比较使用蒙特卡罗算法(MC)和射线追踪算法(有效路径长度法,EPL)计算 CyberKnife 治疗肺部肿瘤的剂量分布。

材料与方法

使用 Multiplan 2.1 和 MC 剂量计算创建可接受的治疗计划。将剂量规定为包含 95%计划靶体积(PTV)的等剂量线,这是临床交付的计划。为了进行比较,使用具有异质性校正的 Ray-Trace 算法(EPL),使用相同的射束、射束方向和监测单位(MU)重新计算该计划的剂量分布。

结果

EPL 计算的靶 PTV 的最大剂量均匀地比 MC 计划大 1.63 倍。在胸部的关键结构中,最大剂量差异最大可达 4 倍。穿过低密度肺的更多射束穿过更大的距离与更大的剂量差异相关,这与 EPL 高估低密度结构中的剂量的事实一致,并且这种效应随着准直器尺寸的减小而更加明显。

结论

我们确定,从 EPL 到 MC 改变治疗计划计算算法会导致靶区和关键器官的剂量覆盖产生很大差异。对于使用较小准直器尺寸的计划,观察到的差异更大,并且与靶-关键结构的解剖关系密切相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.使用射波刀治疗肺部肿瘤时,蒙特卡罗和光线追踪算法计算的计划剂量分布比较:33 例初步研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
2
The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.肺癌治疗计划剂量计算算法比较中射束模型差异的影响
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Mar 7;50(5):801-15. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/006. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
3
Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.调强放疗及叶片宽度对肝脏和肺部病变立体定向体部放疗的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1572-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.075.
4
AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.在切线束治疗中表面堆积区域的 AAA 和 PBC 计算精度。使用蒙特卡罗代码 PENELOPE 进行的体模和乳房案例研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Oct;93(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
5
Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.归一化处方等剂量线对肺部立体定向体部放射治疗中蒙特卡罗与笔形束靶区剂量差异大小的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 8;17(4):48-58. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.5965.
6
Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.使用笔束算法和蒙特卡罗算法对剂量计算准确性进行定量评估以及临床质量保证要求。
Med Dosim. 2013 Autumn;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.肺部肿瘤的立体定向体部放疗:使用PENELOPE进行蒙特卡罗模拟以计算包含呼吸运动的剂量分布,并与不同治疗计划系统进行比较
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 21;52(14):4265-81. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/14/016. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
8
Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.四维(4D)蒙特卡罗剂量计算在实时肿瘤跟踪立体定向体放射治疗肺癌中的研究。
Med Phys. 2012 Sep;39(9):5479-87. doi: 10.1118/1.4739249.
9
Stereotactic radiosurgery-radiotherapy: Should Monte Carlo treatment planning be used for all sites?立体定向放射外科-放射治疗:所有部位都应该使用蒙特卡罗治疗计划吗?
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2011 Oct-Dec;1(4):251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
Influence of smoothing algorithms in Monte Carlo dose calculations of cyberknife treatment plans: a lung phantom study.平滑算法在射波刀治疗计划蒙特卡罗剂量计算中的影响:肺部体模研究
J Cancer Res Ther. 2012 Jul-Sep;8(3):367-72. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.103514.

引用本文的文献

1
AAPM task group report 135.B: Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery.美国医学物理学家协会任务组报告135.B:机器人放射外科手术的质量保证
Med Phys. 2025 Jan;52(1):45-76. doi: 10.1002/mp.17478. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
A deep learning-based dose calculation method for volumetric modulated arc therapy.基于深度学习的容积调强弧形治疗剂量计算方法。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02534-2.
3
Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer.基于射波刀的肺癌立体定向放射治疗剂量计算算法的对比分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 2;13:1215976. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1215976. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of two optimization algorithms (VOLO , SEQU) for CyberKnife® treatment of acoustic neuromas, lung metastases, and liver metastases.两种优化算法(VOLO 、SEQU)在 CyberKnife®治疗听神经瘤、肺转移瘤和肝转移瘤中的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Dec;24(12):e14144. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14144. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of Monte Carlo and Ray Tracing dose calculation algorithms for multiple target brain treatments on CyberKnife.比较 Monte Carlo 和射线追踪剂量计算算法在 CyberKnife 上对多个脑靶区治疗的准确性。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Dec;46(4):1477-1487. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01312-w. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system.基于射波刀系统的双侧肺癌立体定向体部放疗计划中单次计划与双重计划的剂量学和生物学比较。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 21;12:1015999. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1015999. eCollection 2022.
7
A dose perturbation tool for robotic radiosurgery: Experimental validation and application to liver lesions.机器人放射外科剂量扰动工具:实验验证及在肝脏病变中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Nov;23(11):e13766. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13766. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
8
Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife.射波刀治疗脊柱病变的光线追踪算法与蒙特卡罗计算算法的比较
Front Oncol. 2022 May 4;12:898175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898175. eCollection 2022.
9
Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Computed With Finite Size Pencil Beam and Monte Carlo Algorithms Using the InCise™ Multileaf Collimator-Equipped Cyberknife System.使用配备InCise™多叶准直器的射波刀系统,对采用有限尺寸笔形束算法和蒙特卡罗算法计算的治疗计划进行剂量学比较。
J Med Phys. 2020 Jan-Mar;45(1):7-15. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_64_19. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Influence of CyberKnife Prescription Isodose Line on the Discrepancy of Dose Results Calculated by the Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Algorithms for Head and Lung Plans: A Phantom Study.射波刀计划等剂量线对头部和肺部计划射线追踪和蒙特卡罗算法计算剂量结果差异的影响:体模研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Apr;40(2):301-306. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2177-1. Epub 2020 Apr 26.