Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Greece.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):302-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.021. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Using finite element analysis, we evaluated if the site of an aortic bleb, known to be prone to rupture, coincides with the location of peak wall stress (PWS) in a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) model.
PWS was not located at the bleb site, even when stress values were estimated for different bleb wall thicknesses (0.5-2.0 mm) while the rest of the AAA wall was considered constant (2 mm).
The sites of PWS in AAAs should not always be considered as the sites most prone to rupture since other factors, such as wall strength, may play a role in rupture-risk prediction, depicting the need for further investigation of these parameters.
使用有限元分析,我们评估了已知易破裂的主动脉夹层部位是否与患者特定腹主动脉瘤 (AAA) 模型中的峰值壁应力 (PWS) 位置一致。
即使在不同的夹层壁厚度(0.5-2.0 毫米)下估计壁应力值,而 AAA 壁的其余部分被认为是恒定的(2 毫米)时,PWS 也不在夹层部位。
AAA 中 PWS 的部位不应总是被认为是最容易破裂的部位,因为其他因素,如壁强度,可能在破裂风险预测中发挥作用,这表明需要进一步研究这些参数。