Suppr超能文献

初级卫生保健团队内部沟通的机制。

Mechanisms for communicating within primary health care teams.

机构信息

Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, The Gordon J. Mogenson Bldg, 100 Collip Circle, Suite 245, UWO Research Park, London, ON N6G 4X8.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2009 Dec;55(12):1216-22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the types of communication used within primary health care teams (PHCTs), with a particular focus on the mechanisms teams use to promote optimal clinical and administrative information sharing.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative study.

SETTING

Primary health care teams in Ontario between August 2004 and October 2005.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive sampling was used to recruit 121 members from 16 PHCTs reflecting a range of health care professionals, including family physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, social workers, office managers, health promoters, and receptionists.

METHODS

Individual in-depth interviews were conducted. An iterative analysis process was used to examine the verbatim transcripts created from the interviews. Techniques of immersion and crystallization were used in the analysis.

MAIN FINDINGS

Analysis of the data revealed that communication occurs through formal and informal means. Formal communication included regular team meetings with agendas and meeting minutes, memorandums, computer-assisted communication, and communication logs. Informal communication methods were open and opportunistic, reflecting the traditional hallway consultation. For patient care issues, face-to-face communication was preferred. Team member attributes facilitating communication included approachability, availability, and proximity. Finally, funding issues could be an impediment to optimal communication.

CONCLUSION

Primary health care is experiencing demands for enhanced and efficient communication that optimizes team functioning and patient care. This study describes formal and informal mechanisms of communication currently used by PHCTs. Attributes that facilitate team communication, such as approachability, availability, and proximity of team members, were highlighted. New funding arrangements might alleviate concerns about remuneration for attendance at meetings.

摘要

目的

探索基层医疗团队(PHCT)内部使用的沟通类型,特别关注团队用于促进最佳临床和行政信息共享的机制。

设计

描述性定性研究。

地点

2004 年 8 月至 2005 年 10 月期间安大略省的基层医疗团队。

参与者

采用目的抽样法从 16 个 PHCT 中招募了 121 名成员,这些 PHCT 代表了一系列医疗保健专业人员,包括家庭医生、护士从业者、护士、药剂师、营养师、社会工作者、办公室经理、健康促进者和接待员。

方法

进行了个人深入访谈。采用迭代分析过程检查从访谈中创建的逐字记录。在分析中使用了沉浸和结晶技术。

主要发现

数据分析显示沟通通过正式和非正式的方式进行。正式沟通包括定期的团队会议,包括议程和会议纪要、备忘录、计算机辅助沟通和沟通日志。非正式沟通方法是开放和偶然的,反映了传统的走廊咨询。对于患者护理问题,面对面沟通是首选。促进沟通的团队成员属性包括易接近性、可用性和邻近性。最后,资金问题可能是阻碍最佳沟通的因素。

结论

基层医疗保健面临着提高和提高沟通效率的需求,以优化团队运作和患者护理。本研究描述了 PHCT 当前使用的正式和非正式沟通机制。强调了促进团队沟通的属性,例如团队成员的易接近性、可用性和邻近性。新的资金安排可能会减轻对会议出席报酬的担忧。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms for communicating within primary health care teams.
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Dec;55(12):1216-22.
4
It starts with a strong foundation: constructing collaborative interprofessional teams in primary health care.
J Interprof Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):514-520. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1787360. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Conflict on interprofessional primary health care teams--can it be resolved?
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):4-10. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.497750. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
6
Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Mar;25(5-6):619-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13085. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
8
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Interprofessional team meetings: Opportunities for informal interprofessional learning.
J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):426-32. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1016602. Epub 2015 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of the Primary Care Transformation Lead: A Qualitative Case Study.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251327909. doi: 10.1177/21501319251327909. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
3
Implementation of interprofessional digital communication tools in primary care for frail older adults: An interview study.
J Interprof Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2086858. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Strengthening Resident, Proxy, and Staff Engagement in Injury Prevention in Skilled Nursing Facilities.
Gerontologist. 2022 Sep 7;62(8):1112-1123. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab193.
6
Designing for Effective and Safe Multidisciplinary Primary Care Teamwork: Using the Time of COVID-19 as a Case Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168758.
8
Connecting People With Multimorbidity to Interprofessional Teams Using Telemedicine.
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Aug 12;17(Suppl 1):S57-S62. doi: 10.1370/afm.2379.
9
Recommendations to facilitate managers' compliance with quality standards at primary health care clinics.
Curationis. 2019 Apr 23;42(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1984.
10
Processes that influence the evolution of family health teams.
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Jun;64(6):e283-e289.

本文引用的文献

2
Communication in interdisciplinary team meetings: what are we talking about?
J Interprof Care. 2006 Aug;20(4):349-63. doi: 10.1080/13561820600727205.
5
Transdisciplinary teams in primary care for the underserved: a literature review.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 May;16(2):248-56. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0040.
6
Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19;142(8):700-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00038.
8
Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):116-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116.
9
Can health care teams improve primary care practice?
JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1246-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1246.
10
Computerized provider order entry improves workflow and outcomes.
Nurs Manage. 2004 Feb;35(2):40G-H. doi: 10.1097/00006247-200402001-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验