Otani Koichi, Suzuki Akihito, Shibuya Naoshi, Matsumoto Yoshihiko, Kamata Mitsuhiro
Department of Psychiatry, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Dec;197(12):938-41. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c29a4c.
The effects of dysfunctional parenting styles on interpersonal sensitivity were studied in 640 Japanese volunteers. Interpersonal sensitivity was assessed by the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM), and perceived parental rearing was evaluated by the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), which is consisted of care and protection factors. Parental rearing was classified into 4 types, i.e., optimal parenting (high care/low protection), affectionate constraint (high care/high protection), neglectful parenting (low care/low protection), and affectionless control (low care/high protection). Males with paternal affectionless control showed higher total IPSM scores than those with paternal optimal parenting (p = 0.022). Females with maternal affectionate constraint (p = 0.001), neglectful parenting (p = 0.022), and affectionless control (p = 0.003) showed higher total IPSM scores than those with maternal optimal parenting. In males and females, dysfunctional parenting styles by the opposite-sex parents did not affected total IPSM scores. The present study suggests that in both males and females interpersonal sensitivity is increased by dysfunctional parenting styles by the same-sex parents.
在640名日本志愿者中研究了功能失调的养育方式对人际敏感性的影响。人际敏感性通过人际敏感性量表(IPSM)进行评估,而感知到的父母养育方式则通过父母教养方式问卷(PBI)进行评价,该问卷由关爱和保护因素组成。父母养育方式分为4种类型,即最佳养育(高关爱/低保护)、温情约束(高关爱/高保护)、忽视型养育(低关爱/低保护)和冷漠控制(低关爱/高保护)。父亲采用冷漠控制方式的男性,其IPSM总分高于父亲采用最佳养育方式的男性(p = 0.022)。母亲采用温情约束(p = 0.001)、忽视型养育(p = 0.022)和冷漠控制(p = 0.003)方式的女性,其IPSM总分高于母亲采用最佳养育方式的女性。在男性和女性中,异性父母功能失调的养育方式对IPSM总分没有影响。本研究表明,在男性和女性中,同性父母功能失调的养育方式都会增加人际敏感性。