Department of Sport Science and Kinesiology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jan;42(1):187-96. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ac9748.
The aims of the study were a) to compare the double-push skating technique with the V2 and the V1 skating techniques on an uphill terrain by a kinematic and kinetic analysis, b) to provide kinetic and kinematic data of the V1 technique at maximal skiing speeds, and c) to test the hypotheses that the double-push skating technique is faster compared with the V2 and the V1 skating techniques.
Six elite skiers performed maximum speed sprints over a 60-m uphill section (7 degrees -10 degrees) using the double-push, the V2, and the V1 techniques. Pole and plantar forces and cycle characteristics were analyzed.
The double-push skating technique was approximately 4.3% faster (P < 0.05) compared with the V2 skating technique and equally fast compared with the V1 skating technique. The double-push and the V2 techniques demonstrated longer cycle lengths, lower cycle rates (both P < 0.05), and equal poling frequencies and pole forces compared with the V1 technique. Cycle length, peak foot force, and knee extension ranges of motion and velocities were higher in the double-push technique compared with the V2 technique (all P values <0.05). Center of pressure was located more laterally in the double-push technique compared with the other two techniques (P < 0.05). All measured skiing speeds were drastically higher compared with former studies.
The higher skiing speeds of the V1 and the double-push techniques compared with the V2 technique stress the mechanical advantage of those techniques on uphill terrain. Because of larger cycle lengths, lower cycle rate, longer recovery times, and equal poling frequency, the double-push technique might be seen as more economic on steep uphills compared with the V1 technique. From a tactical point of view compared with the V1 technique, the double-push technique needs less space due to less lateral displacement, and no technique transitions are necessary when entering and leaving an uphill section.
本研究的目的是:a)通过运动学和动力学分析,比较在上坡地形上的双推式滑冰技术与 V2 和 V1 滑冰技术;b)提供 V1 技术在最大滑雪速度下的动力学和运动学数据;c)检验双推式滑冰技术比 V2 和 V1 滑冰技术更快的假设。
六名精英滑雪者在上坡 60 米(7 度-10 度)路段上分别采用双推式、V2 和 V1 技术进行最大速度冲刺。分析了杆和足底力以及循环特征。
与 V2 滑冰技术相比,双推式滑冰技术快约 4.3%(P < 0.05),与 V1 滑冰技术一样快。与 V1 技术相比,双推式和 V2 技术的循环长度更长,循环速度更低(均 P < 0.05),极点频率和极点力相等。与 V2 技术相比,双推式技术的循环长度、峰值足部力、膝关节伸展幅度和速度更高(所有 P 值<0.05)。与其他两种技术相比,双推式技术的压力中心更靠外侧(P < 0.05)。所有测量的滑雪速度均明显高于以往的研究。
V1 和双推式技术比 V2 技术的滑雪速度更高,这突出了这些技术在上坡地形上的机械优势。由于循环长度较大、循环速度较低、恢复时间较长以及极点频率相等,双推式技术在陡峭的上坡地形上可能比 V1 技术更具经济性。与 V1 技术相比,从战术角度来看,由于横向位移较小,双推式技术需要的空间更小,而且在进入和离开上坡路段时不需要进行技术转换。