Istituto di Chimica Agraria ed Ambientale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Mar;17(3):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0278-2. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Human health and the environment are major concerns for European Commission policy on the authorisation of plant protection products. The new regulation that revises and replaces the directive 91/414/EC moves towards the adoption of a Persistent Bioaccumulation Toxicity cutoff criterion because current pesticide risk assessment (PRA) is deterministic, based on few standard cases and therefore characterised by uncertainty. This revision could create concerns about sustainability.
This paper analyses some effects of this directive on the agrochemical market and assumes new effects resulting from the introduction of the revision. Suggestions are made as to how pesticide risk assessment will have to adapt to answer the request of legislators on safety standards and sustainability, introducing probabilistic PRA. Toxicity and exposure functions will be fully characterised, producing distributions of predicted impact and quantifying the variability and uncertainty. For adopting PRA studies at the local/catchment scale, new assessment schemes will be necessary.
人类健康和环境是欧洲委员会对植物保护产品授权政策的主要关注点。修订和取代指令 91/414/EC 的新法规朝着采用持久性生物蓄积性毒性截止标准迈进,因为当前的农药风险评估(PRA)是确定性的,基于少数标准案例,因此具有不确定性。这一修订可能会引起对可持续性的关注。
本文分析了该指令对农药市场的一些影响,并假设了修订引入的新影响。本文提出了一些建议,说明农药风险评估将如何适应立法者对安全标准和可持续性的要求,引入概率 PRA。毒性和暴露函数将得到充分描述,产生预测影响的分布,并量化变异性和不确定性。为了在地方/集水区尺度上采用 PRA 研究,需要新的评估方案。