Oussama Mghirbi, Kamel Ellefi, Philippe Le Grusse, Elisabeth Mandart, Jacques Fabre, Habiba Ayadi, Jean-Paul Bord
CIHEAM-IAMM: Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Montpellier, 3191 Route de Mende, 34093, Montpellier cedex 5, France,
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(11):8058-74. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3736-4. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
The excessive use of plant protection products (PPPs) has given rise to issues of public and environmental health because of their toxicity. Reducing the use of toxic PPPs and replacing them with products that are less toxic for human health and the environment have become socially, environmentally and economically indispensable. In this article, we assess the plant protection practices of a small group of winegrowers practicing "integrated agriculture" in the south of France, in order to measure the benefit of using toxicity risk indicators as a decision-support tool for different players in land management. An analysis of plant protection practices using indicators of the risk to operator health and the environment (IRSA, IRTE), together with a frequency-of-treatment indicator (TFI), enabled us to (i) show the variability of these indicators depending on the production system and farmers' pesticide use strategies and (ii) calculate correlations between these indicators. This analysis of plant protection practices at different scales (farm, field), carried out in collaboration with the growers, enabled us to perform an initial validation of decision-support tools for determining risk management strategies regarding the use of pesticides.
由于其毒性,植物保护产品(PPPs)的过度使用引发了公共卫生和环境健康问题。减少有毒PPPs的使用,并将其替换为对人类健康和环境毒性较小的产品,在社会、环境和经济方面已变得不可或缺。在本文中,我们评估了法国南部一小群采用“综合农业”的葡萄种植者的植物保护实践,以便衡量使用毒性风险指标作为土地管理中不同参与者决策支持工具的益处。利用操作人员健康风险指标和环境风险指标(IRSA、IRTE)以及处理频率指标(TFI)对植物保护实践进行分析,使我们能够(i)展示这些指标因生产系统和农民农药使用策略而异的情况,以及(ii)计算这些指标之间的相关性。与种植者合作开展的这种不同规模(农场、田地)的植物保护实践分析,使我们能够对用于确定农药使用风险管理策略的决策支持工具进行初步验证。