School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jan 20;132(2):737-47. doi: 10.1021/ja908326z.
Copper(I)-responsive fluorescent probes based on photoinduced electron transfer (PET) switching consistently display incomplete recovery of emission upon Cu(I) binding compared to the corresponding isolated fluorophores, raising the question of whether Cu(I) might engage in adverse quenching pathways. To address this question, we performed detailed photophysical studies on a series of Cu(I)-responsive fluorescent probes that are based on a 16-membered thiazacrown receptor ([16]aneNS(3)) tethered to 1,3,5-triarylpyrazoline-fluorophores. The fluorescence enhancement upon Cu(I) binding, which is mainly governed by changes in the photoinduced electron transfer (PET) driving force between the ligand and fluorophore, was systematically optimized by increasing the electron withdrawing character of the 1-aryl-ring, yielding a maximum 29-fold fluorescence enhancement upon saturation with Cu(I) in methanol and a greater than 500-fold enhancement upon protonation with trifluoroacetic acid. Time-resolved fluorescence decay data for the Cu(I)-saturated probe indicated the presence of three distinct emissive species in methanol. Contrary to the notion that Cu(I) might engage in reductive electron transfer quenching, femtosecond time-resolved pump-probe experiments provided no evidence for formation of a transient Cu(II) species upon photoexcitation. Variable temperature (1)H NMR experiments revealed a dynamic equilibrium between the tetradentate NS(3)-coordinated Cu(I) complex and a ternary complex involving coordination of a solvent molecule, an observation that was further supported by quantum chemical calculations. The combined photophysical, electrochemical, and solution chemistry experiments demonstrate that electron transfer from Cu(I) does not compete with radiative deactivation of the excited fluorophore, and, hence, that the Cu(I)-induced fluorescence switching is kinetically controlled.
基于光诱导电子转移(PET)开关的铜(I)响应荧光探针与相应的孤立荧光团相比,在与 Cu(I)结合后发射的完全恢复不一致,这引发了一个问题,即 Cu(I)是否可能参与不利的猝灭途径。为了解决这个问题,我们对一系列基于 16 元噻唑冠受体([16]aneNS(3))与 1,3,5-三芳基吡唑啉荧光团连接的铜(I)响应荧光探针进行了详细的光物理研究。荧光增强主要由配体和荧光团之间的光诱导电子转移(PET)驱动力的变化控制,通过增加 1-芳基环的吸电子特性来系统优化,在甲醇中与 Cu(I)饱和时最大荧光增强 29 倍,用三氟乙酸质子化时增强大于 500 倍。Cu(I)饱和探针的时间分辨荧光衰减数据表明,在甲醇中有三种不同的发射物种存在。与 Cu(I)可能参与还原电子转移猝灭的概念相反,飞秒时间分辨泵浦探针实验没有提供在光激发时形成瞬态 Cu(II)物种的证据。变温(1)H NMR 实验表明,四配位 NS(3)-配位的 Cu(I)配合物与涉及配位溶剂分子的三元配合物之间存在动态平衡,这一观察结果得到了量子化学计算的进一步支持。综合光物理、电化学和溶液化学实验表明,来自 Cu(I)的电子转移不会与激发态荧光团的辐射去活化竞争,因此,Cu(I)诱导的荧光开关是动力学控制的。