Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia.
Water Res. 2010 Mar;44(5):1654-66. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.031. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Over recent decades, the environmental regulations on wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) have trended towards increasingly stringent nutrient removal requirements for the protection of local waterways. However, such regulations typically ignore other environmental impacts that might accompany apparent improvements to the WWTP. This paper quantitatively defines the life cycle inventory of resources consumed and emissions produced in ten different wastewater treatment scenarios (covering six process configurations and nine treatment standards). The inventory results indicate that infrastructure resources, operational energy, direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and chemical consumption generally increase with increasing nitrogen removal, especially at discharge standards of total nitrogen <5 mgN L(-1). Similarly, infrastructure resources and chemical consumption increase sharply with increasing phosphorus removal, but operational energy and direct GHG emissions are largely unaffected. These trends represent a trade-off of negative environmental impacts against improved local receiving water quality. However, increased phosphorus removal in WWTPs also represents an opportunity for increased resource recovery and reuse via biosolids applied to agricultural land. This study highlights that where biosolids displace synthetic fertilisers, a negative environmental trade-off may also occur by increasing the heavy metals discharged to soil. Proper analysis of these positive and negative environmental trade-offs requires further life cycle impact assessment and an inherently subjective weighting of competing environmental costs and benefits.
近几十年来,为了保护当地水道,废水处理厂 (WWTP) 的环境法规对营养物质去除的要求越来越严格。然而,这些法规通常忽略了 WWTP 明显改善可能带来的其他环境影响。本文定量定义了在十个不同废水处理方案(涵盖六种工艺配置和九种处理标准)中消耗的资源和产生的排放物的生命周期清单。清单结果表明,基础设施资源、运行能源、直接温室气体 (GHG) 排放和化学品消耗通常随氮去除率的增加而增加,尤其是在总氮 <5 mgN L(-1) 的排放标准下。同样,基础设施资源和化学品消耗随着磷去除率的增加而急剧增加,但运行能源和直接 GHG 排放基本不受影响。这些趋势代表了负面环境影响与改善当地受纳水体质量之间的权衡。然而,WWTP 中磷去除率的增加也为通过施用到农业用地的生物固体增加资源回收和再利用提供了机会。本研究表明,在生物固体替代合成肥料的情况下,通过增加排放到土壤中的重金属,也可能会出现负面的环境权衡。对这些正面和负面环境权衡的正确分析需要进一步的生命周期影响评估,并对竞争环境成本和收益进行固有主观加权。