Suppr超能文献

生物固体管理的技术选择。

Technological options for the management of biosolids.

作者信息

Wang Hailong, Brown Sally L, Magesan Guna N, Slade Alison H, Quintern Michael, Clinton Peter W, Payn Tim W

机构信息

Scion (A Crown Research Institute of New Zealand), Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 Jun;15(4):308-17. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5. Epub 2008 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Large quantities of biosolids (sewage sludge), which are produced from municipal wastewater treatment, are ever-increasing because of the commissioning of new treatment plants and continuous upgrades of the existing facilities. A large proportion of biosolids are currently landfilled. With increasing pressure from regulators and the general public, landfilling of biosolids is being phased out in many countries because of potential secondary pollution caused by leachate and the emission of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Biosolids contain nutrients and energy that can be used beneficially. Significant efforts have been made recently to develop new technologies to manage biosolids and make useful products from them. In this paper, we provide a review of the technologies in biosolids management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey of literature was conducted.

RESULTS

At present, the most common beneficial use of biosolids is agricultural land application because of inherent fertilizer values found in biosolids. Expansion of land application, however, may be limited in the future because of more stringent regulatory requirements and public concern about food chain contamination in some countries. Perceived as a green energy source, the combustion of biosolids has received renewed interest. Anaerobic digestion is generally a more effective method than incineration for energy recovery, and digested biosolids are suitable for further beneficial use through land application. Although conventional incineration systems for biosolid management generally consume more energy than they produce because of the high moisture content in the biosolids, it is expected that more combustion systems, either monocombustion or cocombustion, will be built to cope with the increasing quantity of biosolids.

DISCUSSION

Under the increasingly popular low-carbon economy policy, biosolids may be recognized as a renewable fuel and be eligible for 'carbon credits'. Because ash can be used to manufacture construction materials, combustion can provide a complete management for biosolids. A number of advanced thermal conversion technologies (e.g., supercritical water oxidation process and pyrolysis) are under development for biosolids management with a goal to generate useful products, such as higher quality fuels and recovery of phosphorus. With an ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, growing bioenergy crops and forests using biosolids as a fertilizer and soil amendment can not only contribute to the low-carbon economy but also maximize the nutrient and carbon value of the biosolids.

CONCLUSIONS

Land application of biosolids achieves a complete reuse of its nutrients and organic carbon at a relatively low cost. Therefore, land application should become a preferred management option where there is available land, the quality of biosolids meet regulatory requirements, and it is socially acceptable. Intensive energy cropping and forest production using biosolids can help us meet the ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, which can eliminate the contamination potential for food sources, a common social concern about land application of biosolids. In recent years, increasing numbers of national and local governments have adopted more stringent regulations toward biosolid management. Under such a political climate, biosolids producers will have to develop multireuse strategies for biosolids to avoid being caught because a single route management practice might be under pressure at a short notice. Conventional incineration systems for biosolids management generally consume more energy than they produce and, although by-products may be used in manufacturing, this process cannot be regarded as a beneficial use of biosolids. However, biosolids are likely to become a source of renewable energy and produce 'carbon credits' under the increasingly popular, low-carbon economy policy.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

To manage biosolids in a sustainable manner, there is a need for further research in the following areas: achieving a higher degree of public understanding and acceptance for the beneficial use of biosolids, developing cost-efficient and effective thermal conversions for direct energy recovery from biosolids, advancing technology for phosphorus recovery, and selecting or breeding crops for efficient biofuel production.

摘要

背景、目的和范围:由于新污水处理厂的投产以及现有设施的持续升级,城市污水处理产生的大量生物固体(污水污泥)不断增加。目前,很大一部分生物固体被填埋。由于渗滤液和强效温室气体甲烷排放可能导致的潜在二次污染,在监管机构和公众日益增加的压力下,许多国家正在逐步淘汰生物固体的填埋处理。生物固体含有可有益利用的养分和能量。最近人们做出了重大努力来开发管理生物固体并从中制造有用产品的新技术。在本文中,我们对生物固体管理技术进行了综述。

材料与方法

进行了文献调研。

结果

目前,由于生物固体中固有的肥料价值,生物固体最常见的有益用途是用于农业土地。然而,由于一些国家更严格的监管要求以及公众对食物链污染的担忧,未来土地应用的扩展可能会受到限制。作为一种绿色能源,生物固体的燃烧重新受到关注。厌氧消化通常是比焚烧更有效的能量回收方法,消化后的生物固体适合通过土地应用进一步进行有益利用。尽管由于生物固体中水分含量高,用于生物固体管理的传统焚烧系统通常消耗的能量比产生的能量多,但预计将建造更多的燃烧系统,无论是单燃烧还是共燃烧,以应对不断增加的生物固体量。

讨论

在日益流行的低碳经济政策下,生物固体可能被视为可再生燃料并有资格获得“碳信用额”。由于灰分可用于制造建筑材料,燃烧可为生物固体提供全面管理。一些先进的热转换技术(如超临界水氧化工艺和热解)正在开发用于生物固体管理,目标是生产有用产品,如更高质量的燃料和回收磷。随着对可再生能源需求的不断增加,使用生物固体作为肥料和土壤改良剂种植生物能源作物和森林不仅有助于低碳经济,还能最大限度地提高生物固体的养分和碳价值。

结论

生物固体的土地应用以相对较低的成本实现了其养分和有机碳的完全再利用。因此,在有可用土地、生物固体质量符合监管要求且社会可接受的情况下,土地应用应成为首选的管理选项。使用生物固体进行集约能源作物种植和森林生产有助于我们满足对可再生能源不断增长的需求,这可以消除对食物源的污染可能性,这是社会对生物固体土地应用的一个常见担忧。近年来,越来越多的国家和地方政府对生物固体管理采取了更严格的法规。在这种政治环境下,生物固体生产者将不得不为生物固体制定多重再利用策略,以避免因单一途径的管理做法可能在短时间内面临压力而陷入困境。用于生物固体管理的传统焚烧系统通常消耗的能量比产生的能量多,尽管副产品可用于制造,但此过程不能被视为生物固体 的有益利用。然而,在日益流行的低碳经济政策下,生物固体可能会成为可再生能源的来源并产生“碳信用额”。

建议与展望

为了以可持续方式管理生物固体,需要在以下领域进行进一步研究:提高公众对生物固体有益利用的理解和接受程度,开发具有成本效益且有效的热转换技术以直接从生物固体中回收能量,推进磷回收技术,以及选择或培育用于高效生物燃料生产的作物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验