Group Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Hazard Mater. 2010 May 15;177(1-3):12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
A systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) for CO(2) pipelines is presented. Sources of uncertainties that have been assessed are: failure rates, pipeline pressure, temperature, section length, diameter, orifice size, type and direction of release, meteorological conditions, jet diameter, vapour mass fraction in the release and the dose-effect relationship for CO(2). A sensitivity analysis with these parameters is performed using release, dispersion and impact models. The results show that the knowledge gaps and uncertainties have a large effect on the accuracy of the assessed risks of CO(2) pipelines. In this study it is found that the individual risk contour can vary between 0 and 204 m from the pipeline depending on assumptions made. In existing studies this range is found to be between <1m and 7.2 km. Mitigating the relevant risks is part of current practice, making them controllable. It is concluded that QRA for CO(2) pipelines can be improved by validation of release and dispersion models for high-pressure CO(2) releases, definition and adoption of a universal dose-effect relationship and development of a good practice guide for QRAs for CO(2) pipelines.
基于广泛文献回顾的 CO2管道定量风险评估(QRA)结果中差距和不确定性影响的系统评估。评估了以下不确定性来源:失效率、管道压力、温度、管段长度、直径、孔口尺寸、释放的类型和方向、气象条件、射流直径、释放中的蒸气质量分数以及 CO2的剂量-效应关系。使用释放、扩散和影响模型对这些参数进行了敏感性分析。结果表明,知识差距和不确定性对 CO2管道评估风险的准确性有很大影响。在这项研究中发现,根据假设,个体风险轮廓可以在距管道 0 到 204 米之间变化。在现有研究中,发现该范围在<1m 和 7.2km 之间。缓解相关风险是当前实践的一部分,使它们可控。结论是,可以通过验证高压 CO2释放的释放和扩散模型、定义和采用通用的剂量-效应关系以及制定 CO2管道 QRA 的良好实践指南来改进 CO2管道的 QRA。