Lam Yukyan, Ventrella Jennifer, Baptista Ana Isabel, Rodriguez Juan David
Tishman Environment and Design Center, The New School, New York, New York, United States of America.
Milano School of Policy, Management and Environment, The New School, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0323817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323817. eCollection 2025.
In recent years, there has been a proliferation of new federal investments and policy support for "carbon management" technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), as a strategy to mitigate the United States' greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). The equity implications of deploying these technologies-particularly their impacts on low-income communities and communities of color, or environmental justice (EJ) communities-have been understudied. A prominent example of this is seen in the US power sector, where CCS has been proposed as a means to mitigate the carbon dioxide emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants, one of the major sources of GHGs in the country. EJ community leaders alongside some environmental organizations and researchers have voiced deep concerns about how CCS may exacerbate environmental injustice, given that it is itself input-intensive and can prolong the life of polluting fossil fuel infrastructure, which is disproportionately sited in low-income communities and communities of color. To begin to fill the gap in analyses of the equity implications of carbon management, we conducted a spatial analysis of CCS projects proposed for the power sector and their co-location with EJ communities. Compiling a proposed project list from four CCS databases, we found that 33 of the 35 projects were located in EJ communities, and that additionally, 423 of the 497 (or 85%) EJ census block groups located within three miles of at least one proposed project currently face heightened environmental stress. These results illustrate both the feasibility and the necessity of analyzing the co-location of proposed CCS buildout in EJ communities, and add to the nascent body of literature evaluating the impacts of carbon management technologies such as CCS on these communities.
近年来,美国联邦政府对“碳管理”技术(如碳捕获与封存(CCS))的新投资和政策支持不断增加,将其作为减少美国温室气体排放的一项战略。然而,这些技术应用所涉及的公平性问题,尤其是它们对低收入社区、有色人种社区或环境正义(EJ)社区的影响,却鲜有研究。美国电力部门就是一个突出的例子,CCS被提议作为减少化石燃料发电厂二氧化碳排放的一种手段,而化石燃料发电厂是美国温室气体的主要来源之一。EJ社区领袖以及一些环境组织和研究人员对CCS可能加剧环境不公正深表担忧,因为CCS本身需要大量投入,而且可能会延长污染性化石燃料基础设施的使用寿命,而这些设施在低收入社区和有色人种社区的分布不成比例。为了填补碳管理公平性影响分析方面的空白,我们对电力部门提议的CCS项目及其与EJ社区的共址情况进行了空间分析。通过汇总四个CCS数据库中的项目清单,我们发现35个项目中有33个位于EJ社区,此外,在距离至少一个提议项目三英里范围内的497个EJ普查街区组中,有423个(即85%)目前面临更大的环境压力。这些结果既说明了分析EJ社区中提议的CCS项目建设共址情况的可行性和必要性,也为评估CCS等碳管理技术对这些社区影响的新兴文献增添了内容。