Department of Microbiology, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;76(3):688-94. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01849-09. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
The present study had three goals: (i) to evaluate the relative quantities of aerosolized Bacillus atrophaeus spores deposited on the vertical, horizontal top, and horizontal bottom surfaces in a chamber; (ii) to assess the relative recoveries of the aerosolized spores from glass and stainless steel surfaces with a polyester swab and a macrofoam sponge wipe; and (iii) to estimate the relative recovery efficiencies of aerosolized B. atrophaeus spores and Pantoea agglomerans using a foam spatula at several different bacterial loads by aerosol distribution on glass surfaces. The majority of spores were collected from the bottom horizontal surface regardless of which swab type and extraction protocol were used. Swabbing with a macrofoam sponge wipe was more efficient in recovering spores from surfaces contaminated with high bioaerosol concentrations than swabbing with a polyester swab. B. atrophaeus spores and P. agglomerans culturable cells were detected on glass surfaces using foam spatulas when the theoretical surface bacterial loads were 2.88 x 10(4) CFU and 8.09 x 10(6) CFU per 100-cm(2) area, respectively. The median recovery efficiency from the surfaces using foam spatulas was equal to 9.9% for B. atrophaeus spores when the recovery was calculated relative to the theoretical surface spore load. Using a foam spatula permits reliable sampling of spores on the bioaerosol-exposed surfaces in a wide measuring range. The culturable P. agglomerans cells were recovered with a median efficiency of 0.001%, but staining the swab extracts with fluorescent dyes allowed us to observe that the viable cell numbers were higher by 1.83 log units than culturable organisms. However, additional work is needed to improve the analysis of the foam extracts in order to decrease the limit of detection of Bacillus spores and Gram-negative bacteria on contaminated surfaces.
(i)评估在室内的垂直、水平顶和水平底表面上沉积的雾化枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的相对数量;(ii)评估聚酯拭子和大泡沫海绵拭子从玻璃和不锈钢表面对雾化孢子的相对回收率;以及(iii)通过在玻璃表面上的气溶胶分布来估计不同细菌负荷下使用泡沫刮刀对雾化枯草芽孢杆菌孢子和成团泛菌的相对回收效率。无论使用哪种拭子类型和提取方案,大多数孢子都是从水平底面收集的。用大泡沫海绵拭子擦拭比用聚酯拭子擦拭更有效地从高生物气溶胶浓度污染的表面回收孢子。当理论表面细菌负荷分别为 2.88 x 10(4) CFU 和 8.09 x 10(6) CFU/100-cm(2) 时,使用泡沫刮刀可以在玻璃表面上检测到枯草芽孢杆菌孢子和成团泛菌可培养细胞。使用泡沫刮刀从表面回收的孢子的中位回收率等于枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的 9.9%,当回收相对于理论表面孢子负荷计算时。使用泡沫刮刀可以在较宽的测量范围内可靠地对暴露在生物气溶胶中的表面上的孢子进行采样。可培养的成团泛菌细胞的中位回收率为 0.001%,但用荧光染料染色拭子提取物可使我们观察到活细胞数量比可培养生物高 1.83 个对数单位。然而,需要进一步的工作来改进对泡沫提取物的分析,以降低污染表面上枯草芽孢杆菌孢子和革兰氏阴性细菌的检测限。