National Addiction Centre, Kings College, London, UK.
Subst Use Misuse. 2010;45(1-2):240-52. doi: 10.3109/10826080903080664.
A survey of 448 clients receiving opioid treatment in public clinics in Australia was conducted during 2005, exploring diversion and injection of supervised methadone and buprenorphine, frequency and reported effects of injecting, and the cost and availability of street-purchased pharmacotherapies. The rates of diversion in the preceding 12 months were over three times higher among participants receiving supervised buprenorphine (15.3%) than among those receiving supervised methadone (4.3%). While 26.5% of participants currently prescribed buprenorphine had ever injected buprenorphine, 65.9% of those prescribed methadone reported ever injecting methadone. The majority of participants did not appear to have extensive experience of injecting their medication and most expressed a preference for taking it as directed. Further research is required to determine the optimal approach for the supervised administration of buprenorphine that maximizes the benefits of treatment and minimizes harm and the risk of diversion. The study's limitations are noted.
2005 年,对澳大利亚公立诊所中接受阿片类药物治疗的 448 名患者进行了一项调查,调查内容包括美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的监督注射和滥用、注射的频率和报告的影响,以及街头购买的药物治疗的成本和可及性。在过去 12 个月中,接受监督丁丙诺啡治疗的参与者中,药物滥用的比例(15.3%)是接受监督美沙酮治疗的参与者的三倍多(4.3%)。目前,有 26.5%的接受丁丙诺啡处方的参与者曾经注射过丁丙诺啡,而有 65.9%的接受美沙酮处方的参与者报告曾注射过美沙酮。大多数参与者似乎没有广泛的注射药物经验,大多数人表示愿意按照指示服用药物。需要进一步研究确定监督丁丙诺啡管理的最佳方法,以最大限度地提高治疗效益,最大限度地减少伤害和滥用风险。研究的局限性也在报告中指出。