Suppr超能文献

一种生物恐怖主义风险评估的新模型。

A new model of bioterrorism risk assessment.

作者信息

Radosavljevic Vladan, Belojevic Goran

机构信息

Military Institute of Preventive Medicine in Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Dec;7(4):443-51. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0016.

Abstract

There has been an abundance of different bioterrorist attack scenarios and consequently an unclear biodefense strategy so far. We present a framework for bioterrorism risk assessment that we believe would be useful for policymakers and understandable without needing to be an expert in this field. We retrieved the Medline database via PubMed (from January 1987 to January 2009) and cross-referenced and reviewed the terms biological weapons, biological attacks, bioterror, bio(defense), bio(strategy) and epidemiologic models, and risk assessment. Additionally, we conducted an internet search with the same terms and strategy. We divided bioterrorist attacks into 3 categories: strategical (large-scale), operational (middle-scale), and tactical (small-scale). A bioterrorist attack is presented as a 4-component chain model, including perpetrators, agents, means of delivery, and targets. For any of these 4 components, we propose quantitative and qualitative risk assessment parameters. Here we present a simple scoring system within our model applied to the 2001 U.S. anthrax attacks.

摘要

到目前为止,已经出现了大量不同的生物恐怖袭击场景,因此生物防御策略尚不明晰。我们提出了一个生物恐怖主义风险评估框架,我们认为该框架对政策制定者有用,且无需该领域的专家就能理解。我们通过PubMed检索了Medline数据库(从1987年1月至2009年1月),并交叉引用和审查了生物武器、生物袭击、生物恐怖、生物(防御)、生物(战略)和流行病学模型以及风险评估等术语。此外,我们用相同的术语和策略进行了互联网搜索。我们将生物恐怖袭击分为三类:战略型(大规模)、行动型(中型)和战术型(小规模)。生物恐怖袭击被呈现为一个由四个要素组成的链式模型,包括实施者、制剂、传播手段和目标。对于这四个要素中的任何一个,我们都提出了定量和定性的风险评估参数。在此,我们在模型中展示了一个应用于2001年美国炭疽袭击的简单评分系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验