Institute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1381328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1381328. eCollection 2024.
Predicting, issuing early warnings, and assessing risks associated with unnatural epidemics (UEs) present significant challenges. These tasks also represent key areas of focus within the field of prevention and control research for UEs. A scoping review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, from inception to 31 December 2023. Sixty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Two types of models (data-driven and mechanistic-based models) and a class of analysis tools for risk assessment of UEs were identified. The validation part of models involved calibration, improvement, and comparison. Three surveillance systems (event-based, indicator-based, and hybrid) were reported for monitoring UEs. In the current study, mathematical models and analysis tools suggest a distinction between natural epidemics and UEs in selecting model parameters and warning thresholds. Future research should consider combining a mechanistic-based model with a data-driven model and learning to pursue time-varying, high-precision risk assessment capabilities.
预测、发出预警和评估与非自然传染病(UEs)相关的风险存在重大挑战。这些任务也是非自然传染病预防和控制研究领域的重点关注领域。使用 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase 等数据库进行了范围综述,时间范围为从开始到 2023 年 12 月 31 日。符合纳入标准的研究有 66 项。确定了两种类型的模型(基于数据的和基于机制的模型)和一类用于评估 UEs 风险的分析工具。模型的验证部分涉及校准、改进和比较。报告了三种用于监测 UEs 的监测系统(基于事件的、基于指标的和混合的)。在本研究中,数学模型和分析工具表明,在选择模型参数和预警阈值时,需要区分自然传染病和 UEs。未来的研究应考虑将基于机制的模型与基于数据的模型相结合,并学习追求时变、高精度的风险评估能力。