Centre for Public Health research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 22;9:243. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-243.
Health, fair financing and responsiveness to the user's needs and expectations are seen as the essential objectives of health systems. Efforts have been made to conceptualise and measure responsiveness as a basis for evaluating the non-health aspects of health systems performance. This study assesses the applicability of the responsiveness tool developed by WHO when applied in the context of voluntary HIV counselling and testing services (VCT) at a district level in Kenya.
A mixed method study was conducted employing a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods concurrently. The questionnaire proposed by WHO was administered to 328 VCT users and 36 VCT counsellors (health providers). In addition to the questionnaire, qualitative interviews were carried out among a total of 300 participants. Observational field notes were also written.
A majority of the health providers and users indicated that the responsiveness elements were very important, e.g. confidentiality and autonomy were regarded by most users and health providers as very important and were also reported as being highly observed in the VCT room. However, the qualitative findings revealed other important aspects related to confidentiality, autonomy and other responsiveness elements that were not captured by the WHO tool. Striking examples were inappropriate location of the VCT centre, limited information provided, language problems, and concern about the quality of counselling.
The results indicate that the WHO developed responsiveness elements are relevant and important in measuring the performance of voluntary HIV counselling and testing. However, the tool needs substantial revision in order to capture other important dimensions or perspectives. The findings also confirm the importance of careful assessment and recognition of locally specific aspects when conducting comparative studies on responsiveness of HIV testing services.
健康、公平筹资以及对用户需求和期望的回应被视为卫生系统的基本目标。人们已经努力从概念上和衡量上对回应进行定义,以此作为评估卫生系统绩效中非卫生方面的基础。本研究评估了世卫组织开发的回应性工具在肯尼亚地区自愿艾滋病毒咨询和检测服务(VCT)背景下的适用性。
采用定量和定性研究方法相结合的混合方法研究。向 328 名 VCT 用户和 36 名 VCT 咨询员(卫生提供者)发放了世卫组织提出的问卷。除了问卷,还对总共 300 名参与者进行了定性访谈。此外,还记录了观察性实地笔记。
大多数卫生提供者和用户表示回应性要素非常重要,例如保密性和自主性被大多数用户和卫生提供者视为非常重要,并且在 VCT 室中也被报告为高度观察到的。然而,定性结果揭示了其他与保密性、自主性和其他回应性要素相关的重要方面,这些方面没有被世卫组织工具所捕捉到。引人注目的例子包括 VCT 中心的位置不当、提供的信息有限、语言问题以及对咨询质量的担忧。
结果表明,世卫组织开发的回应性要素在衡量自愿艾滋病毒咨询和检测的绩效方面是相关和重要的。然而,该工具需要进行大量修订,以捕捉其他重要的维度或视角。这些发现还证实了在进行艾滋病毒检测服务回应性的比较研究时,对当地特定方面进行仔细评估和认识的重要性。