Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术与无症状颈动脉狭窄患者初始药物治疗的疗效比较。

Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1110-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1427.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) among asymptomatic patients involves a trade-off between a higher short-term perioperative risk in exchange for a lower long-term risk of stroke. The clinical benefit observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not extend to real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether early intervention (CEA) was superior to initial medical therapy in real-world practice in preventing fatal and nonfatal strokes among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness study was conducted from August 28, 2018, to March 2, 2020, using the Corporate Data Warehouse, Suicide Data Repository, and other databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Data analyzed were those of veterans of the US Armed Forces aged 65 years or older who received carotid imaging between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Patients without a carotid imaging report, those with carotid stenosis of less than 50% or hemodynamically insignificant stenosis, and those with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the 6 months before index imaging were excluded. A cohort of patients who received initial medical therapy and a cohort of similar patients who received CEA were constructed and followed up for 5 years. The target trial method was used to compute weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and estimate the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes in each cohort in the pragmatic sample across 5 years of follow-up. This analysis was repeated after restricting the sample to patients who met RCT inclusion criteria. Cumulative incidence functions for fatal and nonfatal strokes were estimated, accounting for nonstroke deaths as competing risks in both the pragmatic and RCT-like samples.

EXPOSURES

Receipt of CEA vs initial medical therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Fatal and nonfatal strokes.

RESULTS

Of the total 5221 patients, 2712 (51.9%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2678 men [98.8%]) received CEA and 2509 (48.1%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2479 men [98.8%]) received initial medical therapy within 1 year after the index carotid imaging. The observed rate of stroke or death (perioperative complications) within 30 days in the CEA cohort was 2.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.1%). The 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was lower among patients randomized to CEA compared with patients randomized to initial medical therapy (5.6% vs 7.8%; risk difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -4.0% to -0.3%). In an analysis that incorporated the competing risk of death, the risk difference between the 2 cohorts was lower and not statistically significant (risk difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -2.1% to 0.5%). Among patients who met RCT inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.5%-6.5%) among patients randomized to CEA and was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.5%) among those randomized to initial medical therapy (risk difference, -2.1%; 95% CI, -4.4% to -0.2%). Accounting for competing risks resulted in a risk difference of -0.9% (95% CI, -2.9% to 0.7%) that was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that the absolute reduction in the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes associated with early CEA was less than half the risk difference in trials from 20 years ago and was no longer statistically significant when the competing risk of nonstroke deaths was accounted for in the analysis. Given the nonnegligible perioperative 30-day risks and the improvements in stroke prevention, medical therapy may be an acceptable therapeutic strategy.

摘要

重要性

在无症状患者中,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)涉及到短期围手术期风险较高与长期中风风险较低之间的权衡。随机临床试验(RCT)中观察到的临床获益可能不适用于真实世界的实践。

目的

研究在真实世界实践中,早期干预(CEA)是否优于初始药物治疗,以预防无症状颈动脉狭窄患者的致命性和非致命性中风。

设计、设置和参与者:本比较有效性研究于 2018 年 8 月 28 日至 2020 年 3 月 2 日期间使用美国退伍军人事务部的企业数据仓库、自杀数据存储库和其他数据库进行。分析的数据来自年龄在 65 岁或以上的美国武装部队退伍军人,他们在 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间接受了颈动脉成像。排除了没有颈动脉成像报告的患者、颈动脉狭窄小于 50%或血流动力学意义不大的狭窄患者,以及在指数成像前 6 个月内发生中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者。构建了一组接受初始药物治疗的患者队列和一组接受 CEA 的类似患者队列,并对其进行了 5 年的随访。使用目标试验方法计算加权 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并估计在 5 年随访期间实用样本中每个队列致命性和非致命性中风的风险。在将样本限制为符合 RCT 纳入标准的患者后,重复了该分析。估计了致命性和非致命性中风的累积发生率函数,在实用和 RCT 样本人群中,将非中风死亡作为竞争风险进行了考虑。

暴露

接受 CEA 与初始药物治疗。

主要结果和措施

致命性和非致命性中风。

结果

在总共 5221 名患者中,2712 名(51.9%;平均[标准差]年龄,73.6[6.0]岁;2678 名男性[98.8%])接受了 CEA,2509 名(48.1%;平均[标准差]年龄,73.6[6.0]岁;2479 名男性[98.8%])在指数颈动脉成像后 1 年内接受了初始药物治疗。CEA 队列中 30 天内中风或死亡(围手术期并发症)的观察发生率为 2.5%(95%CI,2.0%-3.1%)。与随机接受初始药物治疗的患者相比,随机接受 CEA 治疗的患者 5 年内致命性和非致命性中风的风险较低(5.6% vs 7.8%;风险差异,-2.3%;95%CI,-4.0%至-0.3%)。在纳入竞争风险的分析中,两个队列之间的风险差异较低且无统计学意义(风险差异,-0.8%;95%CI,-2.1%至 0.5%)。在符合 RCT 纳入标准的患者中,随机接受 CEA 治疗的患者 5 年内致命性和非致命性中风的风险为 5.5%(95%CI,4.5%-6.5%),随机接受初始药物治疗的患者为 7.6%(95%CI,5.7%-9.5%)(风险差异,-2.1%;95%CI,-4.4%至-0.2%)。考虑到竞争风险,风险差异为-0.9%(95%CI,-2.9%至 0.7%),无统计学意义。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,与 20 年前的试验相比,早期 CEA 相关的致命性和非致命性中风风险降低幅度不到一半,并且在分析中考虑到非中风死亡的竞争风险时,该风险差异不再具有统计学意义。鉴于围手术期 30 天内不可忽视的风险和中风预防的改善,药物治疗可能是一种可接受的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验