Suppr超能文献

在有和没有现场心脏手术的介入医院就诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗结果。

Outcomes among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Pride Yuri B, Canto John G, Frederick Paul D, Gibson C Michael

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):574-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.841296. Epub 2009 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The quality of care and safety and efficacy of pPCI at hospitals without on-site open heart surgery (No-OHS hospitals) remains an area of active investigation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction enrolled 58 821 STEMI patients from 214 OHS hospitals (n=54 076) and 52 No-OHS hospitals (n=4745) with PCI capabilities from 2004 to 2006. Patients presenting to OHS hospitals had substantially lower in-hospital mortality (7.0% versus 9.8%, P<0.001) and were more likely to receive any form of acute reperfusion therapy (80.8% versus 70.8%, P<0.001). Patients who presented to OHS hospitals were more likely to receive guideline recommended medications within 24 hours of arrival. In a propensity score model matching for patient characteristics and transfer status, in-hospital mortality remained significantly lower among patients presenting to OHS hospitals (7.2% versus 9.3%, P=0.025). When this model was further adjusted for differences in the use of acute reperfusion therapy, medications administered within 24 hours and hospital characteristics, the mortality difference was of borderline significance (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.067). When the propensity score analysis was restricted to patients who underwent pPCI, there was no significant difference in mortality (3.8% versus 3.3%, P=0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

STEMI patients presenting to No-OHS hospitals have substantially higher mortality, are less likely to receive guideline recommended medications within 24 hours, and are less likely to undergo acute reperfusion therapy, although this difference was of borderline significance after adjusting for hospital and treatment variables. There was no difference in mortality among patients undergoing pPCI.

摘要

背景

直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者首选的再灌注策略。在没有现场心脏直视手术的医院(无OHS医院),pPCI的医疗质量、安全性和有效性仍是一个积极研究的领域。

方法与结果

国家心肌梗死注册研究纳入了2004年至2006年期间来自214家有OHS的医院(n = 54076)和52家有PCI能力的无OHS医院(n = 4745)的58821例STEMI患者。就诊于有OHS医院的患者院内死亡率显著更低(7.0%对9.8%,P<0.001),且更有可能接受任何形式的急性再灌注治疗(80.8%对70.8%,P<0.001)。就诊于有OHS医院的患者在到达后24小时内更有可能接受指南推荐的药物治疗。在根据患者特征和转运状态进行倾向评分匹配的模型中,就诊于有OHS医院的患者院内死亡率仍显著更低(7.2%对9.3%,P = 0.025)。当该模型进一步根据急性再灌注治疗的使用差异、24小时内使用的药物和医院特征进行调整时,死亡率差异具有临界显著性(风险比,0.87;95%CI,0.75至1.01;P = 0.067)。当倾向评分分析仅限于接受pPCI的患者时,死亡率无显著差异(3.8%对3.3%,P = 0.44)。

结论

就诊于无OHS医院的STEMI患者死亡率显著更高,在24小时内接受指南推荐药物治疗的可能性更小,接受急性再灌注治疗的可能性也更小,尽管在调整医院和治疗变量后这种差异具有临界显著性。接受pPCI的患者死亡率无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验